0x010461c14e146ac35fe42271bdc1134ee31c703a
0x0104...703a audit. -$14 realised trading PnL across 8 closed position cycles, using the latest 10,000 public fills from May 18, 2026 to May 19, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit.
The dollar PnL is the realised result from closed trades in the data covered. The percentage uses an inferred starting value (current account value $113,526,812 minus closed trading PnL -$14 = starting estimate $113,526,827). This audit does not ingest a deposit or withdrawal ledger, so it can show that trades lost money, but it cannot prove whether the owner also moved funds in or out. Older fills may also exist outside the latest 10,000-fill window.
This is not a fixed last-week or last-month period. It is the actual span covered by the latest 10,000 public fills Hyperliquid exposed for this wallet. Because the public fill source hit its cap, older trades may exist but are not included here.
Only the most recent public fills are visible, so this audit covers the data covered rather than full account history. The sample is too small—eight closed episodes across two calendar days—to support conclusions about edge, consistency, or behavioural patterns. The account is negative $14.44 in the data covered. The dominant exposure is three open leveraged longs (BTC, ETH, ATOM at 20× each) carrying $159.6k in unrealised losses against a $113.5m balance, with no stops in place.
Activity spans 25 hours across 18–19 May 2026. Eight trades closed; 177 remain open. Realised PnL on closed trades is −$1,639.33 against $1,326.7k gross volume. No fees were charged in this window.
Closed trades show mixed results: ENA long (18–19 May, entry 0.1, exit 0.1) returned $6.38; IO long (18 May, 6.16 hours) returned $1.05; IO short (18 May, 3 minutes) lost $0.03; TON long (18–19 May, entry 1.94, exit 1.98) lost $22.71. The TON trade is flagged as an oversized loser—it held $13,987.81 notional at highest balance in this window, hit a 2.4% adverse excursion, and closed at a structural stop distance of 4.0% from entry.
By coin, TON accounts for −$22.46 realised PnL across three episodes (66.7% win rate but one large loss). ENA, IO, and BRETT show small positive contributions. The long side dominates closed activity; the single short (IO) was a micro-position that lasted three minutes.
Win rate is 62.5% across eight closed trades. Profit factor is undefined because realised PnL is negative. Expectancy is −$204.92 per closed trade. The account paid zero fees in the data covered.
The sample is too small to interpret these metrics as indicative of edge or skill.
TON long, 18–19 May (entry 1.94, exit 1.98, −$22.71): Opened at 1.94 on 18 May, held 18.17 hours, and closed at 1.98 on 19 May. Position peaked at $13,987.81 notional. The trade hit a 2.4% adverse move before recovering to a 3.06% favourable move, then closed at a structural stop (4.0% distance). The trade is flagged as an oversized loser—the largest single loss in the data covered and the only closed trade with a behavioural flag.
IO short, 18 May (entry 0.14, exit 0.14, −$0.03): Opened and closed on 18 May in 1.8 minutes. Position notional was $43.77. The trade moved 0.12% against entry before closing flat. No entry price is recorded; this appears to be a liquidation or forced exit.
Three long positions are open with no stops in place:
BTC long: Entry 78,843.7 at 20× leverage. Unrealised loss is −$77,562.24. No mark price or liquidation price is provided in the available data.
ETH long: Entry 2,201.8 at 20× leverage. Unrealised loss is −$81,842.39. No mark price or liquidation price is provided.
ATOM long: Entry 2.0483 at 20× leverage. Unrealised gain is +$741.28. No mark price or liquidation price is provided.
Combined unrealised loss on BTC and ETH is −
No matching position cycles in the data covered.
No matching position cycles in the data covered.
Expectancy is not a forecast. It is the historical average result per closed position cycle in this reconstructed sample.
Replays the same closed position cycles with 1%, 2%, and 4% account-risk sizing. It shows what the wallet would have made or lost if each eligible cycle was sized from account value at entry and a structural stop.
The 1%, 2%, and 4% rules are account-risk limits per position cycle, not leverage settings. If the simulated stop is breached, the cycle is stopped early. Outputs are gross of fees and funding, so use them as risk-shape comparisons rather than exact alternate realised trading PnL.