RRektrospect

0x162cc7c861ebd0c06b3d72319201150482518185

0x162c...8185 wallet audit

0x162c...8185 audit. -$6 realised trading PnL across 1 closed position cycles, using 1,996 public fills from Jun 18, 2026 to Jul 8, 2026.

limited sampleLimited sample: only 1 closed position cycles are visible in the data covered (Jun 18, 2026 to Jul 8, 2026). Raw metrics are shown, but behavioural conclusions stay caveated until there are at least 10 closed cycles. Classification basis: closed net pnl after fees available window.Jun 18-Jul 8 dataThis audit used 1,996 public fills covering Jun 18, 2026 to Jul 8, 2026. The date range comes from the actual public fill and position-cycle timestamps, not a preset calendar period.
ModeProfessional keeps the tone factual. Roast uses the same numbers but writes the commentary more sharply.
ProfessionalRoast
Read trader analysisShare on X
Current account valueAccount value from Hyperliquid's public account state when this audit ran. This is a balance snapshot, not proof of lifetime deposits or withdrawals.$386,155Jun 18-Jul 8
Realised trading PnLClosed trading profit or loss after fees in the data covered: Jun 18, 2026 to Jul 8, 2026. Deposits and withdrawals are not counted as PnL. This is the visible public fill history used by this audit.-$60.0%
Max drawdownLargest fall from a previous balance high to a later low inside the data covered: Jun 18, 2026 to Jul 8, 2026.-53.3%1 closed position cycles
Win rateShare of closed position cycles that ended positive. Profit factor compares total winning realised PnL with total losing realised PnL.0.0%0 profit factor
Total volumeGross notional traded across 1,996 reconstructed public fills. A position cycle can contain many individual fills.$6,077,63714 position cycles
Trading PnL vs transfersRealised trading PnL comes from Hyperliquid closed-fill profit and loss. Deposits and withdrawals can change account value, but they are not counted as trading PnL here.

The dollar PnL is the realised result from closed trades in the data covered. The percentage uses an inferred starting value (current account value $386,155 minus closed trading PnL -$6 = starting estimate $386,161). This audit does not ingest a deposit or withdrawal ledger, so it can show that trades lost money, but it cannot prove whether the owner also moved funds in or out.

Data coveredThis audit used 1,996 public fills covering Jun 18, 2026 to Jul 8, 2026. The date range comes from the actual public fill and position-cycle timestamps, not a preset calendar period.Jun 18, 2026 to Jul 8, 2026

This is not a fixed last-week or last-month period. It is the actual span covered by the public fills used for this wallet, so the page should be read as 20 calendar days of visible trading history.

Public fills
1,996
Position cycles
1 closed, 13 open
Limit
public fill cap not hit
Equity curveA historical line showing how the wallet balance moved across the data covered: Jun 18, 2026 to Jul 8, 2026. It is not a prediction.$386,155
all visible fillsThis audit used 1,996 public fills covering Jun 18, 2026 to Jul 8, 2026. The date range comes from the actual public fill and position-cycle timestamps, not a preset calendar period.
Equity curve by date and account valueX-axis shows date. Y-axis shows account value in US dollars. The line starts at Jun 19 with $386k and ends at Jun 19 with $386k.Account value (USD)Date$386kJun 19
Audit summaryA short extract from the full trader analysis below. It is built from the stored numbers and evidence pack.What matters immediately
  • Data used: 1,996 public fills from Jun 18, 2026 to Jul 8, 2026; this is the actual visible trading span, not a preset last-week or last-month period.
  • The sample is too small to draw reliable conclusions about this account's trading approach.
  • One closed trade exists in the data covered: a long @230 opened 18 June 2026, closed 19 June 2026, for a loss of $5.81.
Analysis readoutA plain-language interpretation layer from the trader analysis. Use the cards and tables below for the raw evidence.Strengths & weaknesses
  • Realised PnL of $30,643 indicates activity beyond the single closed trade, but the closed-trade record does not explain where that PnL originated.
  • Fee drag of $515.63 is material relative to the single closed loss, suggesting execution costs are a meaningful friction point.
  • The sample is too small to assess whether the account exhibits repeatable patterns, risk discipline, or edge.
Trader analysisThis is the full written analysis for this wallet and mode. The metrics, flags, simulator, and tables below are the supporting evidence.Full trader analysis

Bottom line up front

The sample is too small to draw reliable conclusions about this account's trading approach. One closed trade exists in the data covered: a long @230 opened 18 June 2026, closed 19 June 2026, for a loss of $5.81. The account shows $30,643.01 in realised PnL across all activity, but net fee drag of $515.63 consumed most of that edge. Thirteen positions remain open with no closed wins recorded. The account is near break-even after fees in this window.

What the data shows

The wallet has been active for 20 days across 14 total episodes—one closed, thirteen open. Gross trading volume reached $6.08M against a current balance of $386,155. The single closed trade was a 12-hour long position in @230 that lost $5.81 on a notional exposure of $0.01. No entry price is recorded for this trade, and the exit occurred at $1.00.

Realised PnL of $30,643.01 sits against gross fees of $524.84 and net fee drag of $515.63, meaning execution costs consumed approximately 1.7% of the gross realised result. The account generated no winning closed trades in the data covered, with a 0% win rate on the single closed episode.

The majority of the account's capital remains deployed in thirteen open positions. Without visibility into entry prices, current mark prices, or unrealised PnL on these positions, the true account exposure and risk profile cannot be assessed from the closed-trade record alone.

Trade quality

One closed episode produces a 0% win rate and no profit factor. The single trade lost money. Gross fees paid were $524.84 on $6.08M in volume, a rate of approximately 8.6 basis points. The sample is too small to infer edge, consistency, or execution quality from these metrics.

Post-mortems

@230 long, 18–19 June 2026: Opened 18 June at an unrecorded entry price, closed 19 June at $1.00 after 12 hours. Maximum notional exposure was $0.01. The trade realised a loss of $5.81.

Open positions

Thirteen positions remain open. No details on coins, directions, notional sizes, entry prices, or stop placement are provided in the evidence pack.

Honest summary

  • Realised PnL of $30,643 indicates activity beyond the single closed trade, but the closed-trade record does not explain where that PnL originated.
  • Fee drag of $515.63 is material relative to the single closed loss, suggesting execution costs are a meaningful friction point.
  • The sample is too small to assess whether the account exhibits repeatable patterns, risk discipline, or edge.

Behaviour checksRule-based warnings found in the trading history. They are not moral judgements; they mark patterns worth reviewing.

Rule-based position-cycle checks
FOMO re-entryReopened the same market and direction soon after a winning close, but at a worse entry.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

Averaging downAdded size while the position was already moving against the entry.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

Oversized loserA losing position cycle more than 3x the wallet's median closed loss.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

Revenge tradeOpened a larger-than-normal position within one hour after a closed loss.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

ExpectancyAverage result per closed position cycle after wins and losses are blended. Positive means each completed cycle added money on average.-$5.81
Fees / realised PnLFees as a share of realised trading PnL. High values mean execution cost is eating a meaningful part of the edge.+1.7%
Maker fill rateShare of fills that added liquidity rather than crossed the spread. Higher maker share usually means more patient execution.+11.0%

Expectancy is not a forecast. It is the historical average result per closed position cycle in this reconstructed sample.

Risk simulatorA counterfactual replay of the same historical trades using fixed risk limits. It is for comparing risk shape, not predicting future returns.

Replays the same closed position cycles with 1%, 2%, and 4% account-risk sizing. It shows what the wallet would have made or lost if each eligible cycle was sized from account value at entry and a structural stop.

1% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 1% of account value at the simulated stop.$0
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
0.0%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
0
2% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 2% of account value at the simulated stop.$0
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
0.0%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
0
4% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 4% of account value at the simulated stop.$0
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
0.0%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
0

The 1%, 2%, and 4% rules are account-risk limits per position cycle, not leverage settings. If the simulated stop is breached, the cycle is stopped early. Outputs are gross of fees and funding, so use them as risk-shape comparisons rather than exact alternate realised trading PnL.

No simulator curve yetThis wallet has no simulated closes with usable stop and candle data. The cards above are scenario totals; a time-series curve needs at least two simulated closes.

Top lossesThe largest realised losing position cycles in the data covered by this audit.

Click a row for the trade breakdown
MarketThe traded Hyperliquid market or coin.SideLong means the wallet benefited if price rose. Short means it benefited if price fell.SizeLargest notional exposure reached during the reconstructed position cycle.PnLRealised profit or loss when the position cycle closed.DateClosed date when available; otherwise the cycle open date.

Top winsThe largest realised winning position cycles in the data covered by this audit.

Realised position-cycle outcomes
MarketThe traded Hyperliquid market or coin.SideLong means the wallet benefited if price rose. Short means it benefited if price fell.SizeLargest notional exposure reached during the reconstructed position cycle.PnLRealised profit or loss when the position cycle closed.DateClosed date when available; otherwise the cycle open date.

By marketBreaks the audit down by traded market or coin so you can see which markets helped or hurt the account.

Realised results by coin
CoinThe traded Hyperliquid market.CyclesClosed reconstructed position cycles for this market. One cycle can contain many fills.WinShare of that market's closed position cycles that ended positive.PnLRealised PnL attributed to this market's closed position cycles in the data covered by this audit.
@23010.0%-$6
Share this audit on X