- Open xyz:MU short dominates this wallet: $469,445 notional, $86,390 +155.4% unrealised, 10x cross, liquidation $4,951.
- Closed-trade context: $61,441 realised trading PnL across 69 closed position cycles in the data covered.
- Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from May 6, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
0x2025137a136bea7446deba681cbfc7cf1970840e
0x2025...840e wallet audit
Open xyz:MU short dominates this wallet: $469,445 notional, $86,390 +155.4% unrealised, 10x cross, liquidation $4,951. Closed trades are supporting context: $61,441 realised trading PnL across 69 closed position cycles, using the latest 10,000 public fills from May 6, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit.
Closed trades still matter, but they are not the main account story here. The closed-trade sample covers May 6, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; the open-position figures are live account-state figures from Hyperliquid when the audit ran. The unrealised PnL is still open, not a locked result; liquidation at $4,951 remains the downside boundary for this position.
- Position
- xyz:MU short
- Open PnL
- $86,390 (+155.4% ROE)
- Notional
- $469,445
- Liquidation
- $4,951
- Read this as
- entry $1,160 · mark $979.54 · 10x cross · $46,944 margin used
This audit is position-dominated, so open unrealised PnL is shown separately from closed realised trading PnL. The dollar PnL is the realised result from closed trades in the data covered. The percentage uses an inferred starting value (current account value $5,608,733 minus closed trading PnL $61,441 = starting estimate $5,547,293). This audit does not ingest a deposit or withdrawal ledger, so it can show that trades lost money, but it cannot prove whether the owner also moved funds in or out. Older fills may also exist outside the latest 10,000-fill window.
This is not a fixed last-week or last-month period. It is the actual span covered by the latest 10,000 public fills Hyperliquid exposed for this wallet. Because the public fill source hit its cap, older trades may exist but are not included here.
- Public fills
- 10,000
- Position cycles
- 69 closed, 25 open
- Limit
- latest 10,000 fills only
- The closed PnL is legitimate: $59,786 realised after $545 in fees on $23.2m in closed trade volume. That's 0.26% net edge on closed trades. The win-loss ratio of 3.14 and profit factor of 3.63 are real.
- Maker rebates are helping: 82.29% maker fills means you're getting paid the spread on most entries. That's discipline in execution, even if the position sizing and re-entry logic aren't.
- VVV and ORCL closed clean: No averaging, no revenge flags, just entry, hold, exit. That's the template that works.
The opening paragraph
Only the most recent public fills are visible in this data covered.
You're short 479.25 shares of MU at $1,159.80, currently worth $469,444.54, sitting on an unrealised gain of $86,390.31—a 155.42% ROE on 10x leverage. That's still open exposure. The unrealised PnL is not locked in. The liquidation price at $4,950.73 is a theoretical downside boundary, but the outcome is unknown until the position closes. Meanwhile, the rest of the book is a carnival of underwater positions: APT long is down $95,608 on a -798% ROE, kPEPE long is bleeding $6,210, and SOL long is -$825.76 on -156% ROE. The MU short is carrying the entire account on its back while the open portfolio hemorrhages $270,398 in unrealised losses across 25 positions.
The greatest hits
- MU short dominates the risk profile: The $469k position accounts for 44.6% of total open notional value. If it closes at current mark, you lock in $86k. If it doesn't, you're exposed to a 4,950-point liquidation boundary on a 10x margin cross account. The position is still open.
- APT long is a $95,608 crater: Entered at $3.1159, now marking $0.6292. The funding bleed is $18,070 data-covered, with $6,744 paid since open. This is not a position; it's a slow-motion liquidation watch. No stop in place.
- kPEPE long entered at $0.004, now $0.0028: $6,210 down on a 10x leverage micro-cap. Funding paid $292.83. The size is 5.4m tokens. This reads like a revenge entry after a loss, and the evidence pack flags exactly that pattern across five separate re-entries.
- The closed trades that got you here: VVV long closed for $59,541 (7.99 hours), ORCL for $6,535, MSTR for $3,003. Three clean wins. Then the day turned into a revenge-trade demolition: CL long lost $2,659 (flagged as averaging-down, oversized, revenge), SNDK long lost $2,126 (same flags), MU long lost $3,934 on a 3-minute hold. You closed 69 episodes in the data covered and finished +$61,441 net, but you're carrying $270k in unrealised losses to get there.
- Five re-entries, four of them red: The evidence pack flags FOMO re-entries on CL, XYZ100, MU, CRCL, and XYZ100 again. CRCL cost you $1,603 on the re-entry alone. MU re-entry cost $178. Only XYZ100's second re-entry printed $53. The pattern is: close a loss, wait 4-45 minutes, re-enter the same coin at a worse price, hope for mean reversion, get punched again.
The pattern
You have a profitable closed record—53.62% win rate, 3.63 profit factor, $890 expectancy per trade—but you're funding it by holding oversized, under-stopped positions that move against you. The closed wins (VVV, ORCL, TSLA, NVDA, SKHX) are real edges. The closed losses (CL, SNDK, MU, CRCL) are all flagged as revenge trades or averaging-down episodes after small losses. You then re-enter the same coins within minutes at worse prices. The MU short is the only open position that's working; everything else is a margin call waiting for a wick.
The reluctant compliments
- The closed PnL is legitimate: $59,786 realised after $545 in fees on $23.2m in closed trade volume. That's 0.26% net edge on closed trades. The win-loss ratio of 3.14 and profit factor of 3.63 are real.
- Maker rebates are helping: 82.29% maker fills means you're getting paid the spread on most entries. That's discipline in execution, even if the position sizing and re-entry logic aren't.
- VVV and ORCL closed clean: No averaging, no revenge flags, just entry, hold, exit. That's the template that works.
The verdict
You're profitable on closed trades but insolvent on open ones. The MU short is a $86k unrealised win that's masking a $270k unrealised loss portfolio. Close the APT, kPEPE, and SOL positions. They're not waiting for recovery; they're waiting for liquidation.
Behaviour checksRule-based warnings found in the trading history. They are not moral judgements; they mark patterns worth reviewing.
Rule-based position-cycle checks- xyz:CL on May 6, 2026: re-entered at 89.88 after closing at 91.6 (May 6, 2026 prior close); outcome $582.
- xyz:XYZ100 on May 6, 2026: re-entered at 28,325.69 after closing at 28,274.7 (May 6, 2026 prior close); outcome $53.
- xyz:CL on May 6, 2026: added to the position; while it was already moving against entry; outcome -$2,659.
- xyz:MU on May 6, 2026: added to the position; while it was already moving against entry; outcome $1,580.
- xyz:CL: -$2,659 realised loss; 11.9x median closed loss.
- xyz:SNDK: -$2,126 realised loss; 9.5x median closed loss.
- xyz:CL on May 6, 2026: followed a -$308 loss; larger-than-normal size.
- xyz:TSLA on May 6, 2026: followed a -$57 loss; larger-than-normal size.
Expectancy is not a forecast. It is the historical average result per closed position cycle in this reconstructed sample.
Risk simulatorA counterfactual replay of the same historical trades using fixed risk limits. It is for comparing risk shape, not predicting future returns.
Replays the same closed position cycles with 1%, 2%, and 4% account-risk sizing. It shows what the wallet would have made or lost if each eligible cycle was sized from account value at entry and a structural stop.
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- -11.3%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 14
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- -22.4%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 14
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- -43.4%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 14
The 1%, 2%, and 4% rules are account-risk limits per position cycle, not leverage settings. If the simulated stop is breached, the cycle is stopped early. Outputs are gross of fees and funding, so use them as risk-shape comparisons rather than exact alternate realised trading PnL.