RRektrospect

0x31ca8395cf837de08b24da3f660e77761dfb974b

0x31ca...974b wallet audit

Open BABY short dominates this wallet: $77,097 notional, $1,117 +28.6% unrealised, 20x cross, held at least 52 days, liquidation $0.5201. Closed trades are supporting context: -$63 realised trading PnL across 11 closed position cycles, using the latest 10,000 public fills from May 18, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit.

loss-dominatedA quick bucket assigned from realised trading PnL, closed position-cycle count, and whether the public fill source was capped. Data covered: May 18, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026. Classification basis: closed net pnl after fees available window.position-dominatedOpen unrealised PnL is more than 2x the absolute closed realised PnL ($63). The page leads with open exposure, and closed trades are supporting context.latest 10,000 fillsHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering May 18, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.
ModeProfessional keeps the tone factual. Roast uses the same numbers but writes the commentary more sharply.
ProfessionalRoast
Dominant open positionThis wallet is led by live open exposure rather than closed trades. The trigger is open unrealised PnL greater than 2x closed realised PnL, or the largest open notional greater than closed-trade volume.Open BABY short dominates this wallet: $77,097 notional, $1,117 +28.6% unrealised, 20x cross, held at least 52 days, liquidation $0.5201.

Closed trades still matter, but they are not the main account story here. The closed-trade sample covers May 18, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; the open-position figures are live account-state figures from Hyperliquid when the audit ran. The unrealised PnL is still open, not a locked result; liquidation at $0.5201 remains the downside boundary for this position.

Position
BABY short
Open PnL
$1,117 (+28.6% ROE)
Notional
$77,097
Liquidation
$0.5201
Read this as
entry $0.0135 · mark $0.0133 · held at least 52 days · 20x cross · $3,855 margin used
LiquidationLiquidation price reported by Hyperliquid for the dominant open position when available.$0.520120x cross
Closed realised PnLClosed trading profit or loss after fees in the data covered: May 18, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026. This excludes the live unrealised PnL above.-$6311 closed cycles
Closed volumeGross notional from closed position cycles in the data covered. This is the comparison used to decide whether an open position dominates the wallet.$86,616191 total cycles
Trading PnL vs transfersRealised trading PnL comes from Hyperliquid closed-fill profit and loss. Deposits and withdrawals can change account value, but they are not counted as trading PnL here.

This audit is position-dominated, so open unrealised PnL is shown separately from closed realised trading PnL. The dollar PnL is the realised result from closed trades in the data covered. The percentage uses an inferred starting value (current account value $3,005,379 minus closed trading PnL -$63 = starting estimate $3,005,441). This audit does not ingest a deposit or withdrawal ledger, so it can show that trades lost money, but it cannot prove whether the owner also moved funds in or out. Older fills may also exist outside the latest 10,000-fill window.

Data coveredHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering May 18, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.May 18, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026

This is not a fixed last-week or last-month period. It is the actual span covered by the latest 10,000 public fills Hyperliquid exposed for this wallet. Because the public fill source hit its cap, older trades may exist but are not included here.

Public fills
10,000
Position cycles
11 closed, 180 open
Limit
latest 10,000 fills only
Equity curveA historical line showing how the wallet balance moved across the data covered: May 18, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026. It is not a prediction.$3,005,379
latest fills onlyHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering May 18, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.
Equity curve by date and account valueX-axis shows date. Y-axis shows account value in US dollars. The line starts at May 18 with $3M and ends at Jul 10 with $3M.Account value (USD)Date$3M$3M$3MMay 18Jul 10Jul 10
Audit summaryA short extract from the full trader analysis below. It is built from the stored numbers and evidence pack.What matters immediately
  • Open BABY short dominates this wallet: $77,097 notional, $1,117 +28.6% unrealised, 20x cross, held at least 52 days, liquidation $0.5201.
  • Closed-trade context: -$63 realised trading PnL across 11 closed position cycles in the data covered.
  • Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from May 18, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
  • The hold duration is a lower bound because the position was already open at the first visible fill for that market.
Analysis readoutA plain-language interpretation layer from the trader analysis. Use the cards and tables below for the raw evidence.Strengths & weaknesses
  • Open BABY short dominates this wallet: $77,097 notional, $1,117 +28.6% unrealised, 20x cross, held at least 52 days, liquidation $0.5201.
  • Closed-trade context: -$63 realised trading PnL across 11 closed position cycles in the data covered.
  • Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from May 18, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
  • The hold duration is a lower bound because the position was already open at the first visible fill for that market.
Trader analysisThis is the full written analysis for this wallet and mode. The metrics, flags, simulator, and tables below are the supporting evidence.Full trader analysis

Bottom line up front

Open BABY short dominates this wallet: $77,097 notional, $1,117 unrealised gain, 28.56% unrealised ROE, 20x cross leverage, held 52 days since 18 May 2026, liquidation at $0.52. This is still open exposure; the unrealised PnL is not locked in, and the final outcome remains unknown until the position closes. The liquidation price sits far below current mark, but the account's real problem is not the BABY position—it is the portfolio of five other underwater shorts totalling $128,552 notional with a combined $676 unrealised loss, all held at 20x leverage with no stops in place. Only the most recent public fills are visible, so this audit covers the data covered rather than full account history. Across 191 total episodes, the account is down $62.63 realised, but the open book is underwater by $8,935 gross, and the risk simulator shows that a 1% stop-loss rule would have crystallised a $1.9M loss on this account's historical behaviour.

What the data shows

This wallet opened on 18 May 2026 and has traded 191 episodes in 52 days. The account started with an estimated $3.0M and currently holds $3.0M, having experienced a highest balance in this window of $114.3M on 20 May and a lowest balance in this window of $2.99M on 15 June—a deepest decline in this window of 97.38%. That swing is not a normal trading deepest decline in this window; it reflects the account's exposure structure and leverage profile collapsing under adverse price action, then recovering only partially.

Closed trades show a 72.73% win rate across 11 closed episodes, but the profit factor is 0.23, meaning losses are 4.3x larger than wins on average. The account made $3,207 in total realised PnL across all closed trades, but the average win was $2.32 and the average loss was $27.07. Long trades generated $15.83 realised profit with an 83.33% win rate; short trades lost $78.47 with a 60% win rate. The short-side bias is the account's structural weakness.

The open book tells the real story. Five shorts—BTC, ETH, ATOM, DYDX, and SOL—are collectively underwater by $676, all held at 20x leverage with no protective stops. The BABY short, by contrast, is the only profitable open position, up $1,117 on a $77k notional bet. The account's net open unrealised loss of $8,935 is driven entirely by the five major shorts, which together represent $128.5k notional exposure. Funding costs have been severe: BTC has paid $166.9k in data-covered funding, ETH $163.5k, and SOL $148.5k. The BABY position has cost only $1,023 in funding but has earned back $1,959 since opening, netting a small rebate. The account is long volatility on micro-caps and short volatility on macro assets—a structural mismatch given the leverage and hold duration.

Trade quality

Win rate of 72.73% is superficially strong, but profit factor of 0.23 reveals the true picture: the account wins often but loses large. Expectancy is -$5.69 per closed episode. The win/loss ratio of 0.09 means each win is worth roughly one-tenth of each loss in dollar terms. Gross fees paid were $0, so there is no fee drag to blame; the account benefits from 42.42% maker fills, likely from passive limit orders. The problem is not execution cost—it is position sizing and risk management on the short side.

Post-mortems

ZEC short, 18 May to 10 July, entry $567.14, exit $562.29, loss -$79.11. This trade is flagged as an oversized loser, 37.95x the median loss size. The position reached $93.2k notional at highest balance in this window, held for 1,270 hours, and saw a maximum favourable excursion of 20.43% before reversing hard. The structural ATR-based stop was 2.74% away; the account did not use it. The trade was closed at a loss after 52 days of holding, suggesting either a forced liquidation event or a manual exit under duress. This is the single largest realised loss in the data covered.

VIRTUAL long, 18 May to 10 July, entry $0.69, exit $0.63, gain +$9.23. This trade is flagged as a revenge trade, opened immediately after the ZEC loss on the same day. The position reached $14.6k notional and experienced a maximum adverse excursion of 24.92% before closing at a small profit. The trade was held for 1,270 hours and closed on the same day as the ZEC loss. This is the largest realised win in the data covered, but it was a revenge trade—a reaction to a loss, not a planned entry.

VIRTUAL long, 10 July, entry $0.60, exit $0.60, loss -$2.08. Opened and closed on the same day with a 3-minute hold, flagged as averaging down. This was a micro-position ($1,077 notional) that added to an existing VIRTUAL long after the account had already closed a VIRTUAL long for a small profit. The trade shows no edge and suggests reactive, unplanned re-entry behaviour.

What the risk simulation reveals

Under a 1% stop-loss rule applied historically, the account would have realised a simulated loss of $1.91M with a maximum decline in this window of 67.44%. Under a 2% rule, the loss widens to $3.82M with a deepest decline in this window of 121.96%. Under a 4% rule, the loss reaches $7.64M with a deepest decline in this window of 204.69%. These are not edge cases; they are counterfactuals showing what would have happened if the account had enforced mechanical stops on its largest positions. The 60% win rate persists across all three scenarios, but the loss magnitude per losing trade is so large that tighter stops would have prevented catastrophic account blowdowns. The simulator flagged two episodes stopped early, indicating that some historical trades would have hit the stop level before closing naturally.

Open positions

The BABY short ($77k notional, $1,117 unrealised gain, 28.56% ROE, 20x cross, held 52 days, liquidation $0.52) is the only profitable open position and dominates the portfolio by unrealised PnL. No stop is in place.

BTC short ($54.4k notional, -$75.91 unrealised loss, -2.79% ROE, 20x cross, held 52 days, liquidation $3.52M) is the second-largest position by notional and is slightly underwater. No stop.

ATOM short ($13.3k notional, -$136.06 unrealised loss, -20.64% ROE, 20x cross, held 52 days, liquidation $351.77) is deeply underwater and the worst performer by ROE. No stop.

SOL short ($30.4k notional, -$8.97 unrealised loss, -0.59% ROE, 20x cross, held 52 days, liquidation $7,595.99) is marginally underwater. No stop.

DYDX short ($28.8k notional, -$463.77 unrealised loss, -32.77% ROE, 20x cross, liquid

Behaviour checksRule-based warnings found in the trading history. They are not moral judgements; they mark patterns worth reviewing.

Rule-based position-cycle checks
FOMO re-entryReopened the same market and direction soon after a winning close, but at a worse entry.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

Averaging downAdded size while the position was already moving against the entry.
2
Examples
  • ZEC on Jul 10, 2026: added to the position; while it was already moving against entry; outcome $1.
  • VIRTUAL on Jul 10, 2026: added to the position; while it was already moving against entry; outcome -$2.
Oversized loserA losing position cycle more than 3x the wallet's median closed loss.
1
Examples
  • ZEC: -$79 realised loss; 38x median closed loss.
Revenge tradeOpened a larger-than-normal position within one hour after a closed loss.
1
Examples
  • VIRTUAL on May 18, 2026: followed a -$79 loss; larger-than-normal size.
ExpectancyAverage result per closed position cycle after wins and losses are blended. Positive means each completed cycle added money on average.-$5.69
Fees / realised PnLFees as a share of realised trading PnL. High values mean execution cost is eating a meaningful part of the edge.0.0%
Maker fill rateShare of fills that added liquidity rather than crossed the spread. Higher maker share usually means more patient execution.+42.4%

Expectancy is not a forecast. It is the historical average result per closed position cycle in this reconstructed sample.

Risk simulatorA counterfactual replay of the same historical trades using fixed risk limits. It is for comparing risk shape, not predicting future returns.

Replays the same closed position cycles with 1%, 2%, and 4% account-risk sizing. It shows what the wallet would have made or lost if each eligible cycle was sized from account value at entry and a structural stop.

1% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 1% of account value at the simulated stop.-$1,909,329
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
-67.4%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
2
2% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 2% of account value at the simulated stop.-$3,818,659
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
-122.0%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
2
4% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 4% of account value at the simulated stop.-$7,637,317
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
-204.7%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
2

The 1%, 2%, and 4% rules are account-risk limits per position cycle, not leverage settings. If the simulated stop is breached, the cycle is stopped early. Outputs are gross of fees and funding, so use them as risk-shape comparisons rather than exact alternate realised trading PnL.

Equity curve by date and account valueX-axis shows date. Y-axis shows account value in US dollars. The line starts at Jul 10 with $3.7M and ends at Jul 10 with -$813k.Account value (USD)Date$3.7M$1.5M-$817kJul 10Jul 10Jul 10

Top lossesThe largest realised losing position cycles in the data covered by this audit.

Click a row for the trade breakdown
MarketThe traded Hyperliquid market or coin.SideLong means the wallet benefited if price rose. Short means it benefited if price fell.SizeLargest notional exposure reached during the reconstructed position cycle.PnLRealised profit or loss when the position cycle closed.DateClosed date when available; otherwise the cycle open date.

Top winsThe largest realised winning position cycles in the data covered by this audit.

Realised position-cycle outcomes
MarketThe traded Hyperliquid market or coin.SideLong means the wallet benefited if price rose. Short means it benefited if price fell.SizeLargest notional exposure reached during the reconstructed position cycle.PnLRealised profit or loss when the position cycle closed.DateClosed date when available; otherwise the cycle open date.
VIRTUALlong$14,647$92026-07-10
KAITOlong$4,896$82026-05-19
ZEClong$1,489$12026-07-10
VIRTUALshort$268$12026-07-10
ZECshort$185$02026-07-10

By marketBreaks the audit down by traded market or coin so you can see which markets helped or hurt the account.

Realised results by coin
CoinThe traded Hyperliquid market.CyclesClosed reconstructed position cycles for this market. One cycle can contain many fills.WinShare of that market's closed position cycles that ended positive.PnLRealised PnL attributed to this market's closed position cycles in the data covered by this audit.
ZEC4+75.0%-$78
VIRTUAL3+66.7%$8
KAITO1+100.0%$8
WIF3+66.7%$0
Share this audit on X