- Open xyz:XYZ100 short dominates this wallet: $5,620,608 notional, -$35,043 -18.8% unrealised, 30x isolated, held at least 63 days, liquidation $30,217.
- Closed-trade context: -$15,295 realised trading PnL across 24 closed position cycles in the data covered.
- Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from May 8, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
- The hold duration is a lower bound because the position was already open at the first visible fill for that market.
0x3bcae23e8c380dab4732e9a159c0456f12d866f3
0x3bca...66f3 wallet audit
Open xyz:XYZ100 short dominates this wallet: $5,620,608 notional, -$35,043 -18.8% unrealised, 30x isolated, held at least 63 days, liquidation $30,217. Closed trades are supporting context: -$15,295 realised trading PnL across 24 closed position cycles, using the latest 10,000 public fills from May 8, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit.
Closed trades still matter, but they are not the main account story here. The closed-trade sample covers May 8, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; the open-position figures are live account-state figures from Hyperliquid when the audit ran. The unrealised PnL is still open, not a locked result; liquidation at $30,217 remains the downside boundary for this position.
- Position
- xyz:XYZ100 short
- Open PnL
- -$35,043 (-18.8% ROE)
- Notional
- $5,620,608
- Liquidation
- $30,217
- Read this as
- entry $29,651 · mark $29,837 · held at least 63 days · 30x isolated · $166,529 margin used
This audit is position-dominated, so open unrealised PnL is shown separately from closed realised trading PnL. The dollar PnL is the realised result from closed trades in the data covered. The percentage uses an inferred starting value (current account value $10,767,702 minus closed trading PnL -$15,295 = starting estimate $10,782,996). This audit does not ingest a deposit or withdrawal ledger, so it can show that trades lost money, but it cannot prove whether the owner also moved funds in or out. Older fills may also exist outside the latest 10,000-fill window.
This is not a fixed last-week or last-month period. It is the actual span covered by the latest 10,000 public fills Hyperliquid exposed for this wallet. Because the public fill source hit its cap, older trades may exist but are not included here.
- Public fills
- 10,000
- Position cycles
- 24 closed, 16 open
- Limit
- latest 10,000 fills only
- Visible strength: BTC longs worked consistently (72.7% win rate, $19.3k profit). The account has identified an edge in one instrument and direction.
- Visible weakness: Shorts have zero edge (0% win rate, -$38.7k loss). The account has persisted in a losing direction across multiple instruments and has not adapted.
- Visible weakness: Oversized losers dominate the loss ledger. Four trades flagged as 3–6.5× median loss size account for $41.5k of the $70.9k realised loss. Position sizing is not calibrated to risk.
- Visible weakness: No stops are deployed on any open position, including the dominant XYZ100 short. The account is exposed to liquidation on the XYZ100 at $30,217 (0.19% below current mark) with no mechanical protection.
Bottom line up front
Open XYZ100 short dominates this wallet: $5.62m notional, -$35,043 unrealised PnL, -18.82% unrealised ROE, 30× leverage, isolated margin, held 63 days, liquidation at $30,217. This position is still open; the unrealised loss is not locked in, and the liquidation level remains the downside boundary. The account is -0.14% in the data covered, but that headline obscures the real story: a single underwater short position has consumed nearly all closed-trade profits. Only the most recent public fills are visible, so this audit covers the data covered rather than full account history.
What the data shows
The account opened on 8 May 2026 and has executed 40 total episodes (24 closed, 16 open) across 63 days. Realised PnL on closed trades is -$70,991 after $18,788 in fees, a net loss of -$52,203 before the open book. The XYZ100 short, initiated on 8 May at $29,651 and still held, has accrued -$35,043 in unrealised losses while funding costs have drained a further -$5,418 data-covered. Without this single position, the closed-trade record would show a small profit; with it, the account sits at -$95,744 in net unrealised losses across all open positions.
The long side generated $23,426 realised PnL on a 61% win rate across 18 episodes. BTC longs were the primary edge: 11 episodes, 72.7% win rate, $19,293 profit. The short side lost $38,720 on a 0% win rate across 10 episodes—a complete absence of edge. ETH and the two INTC shorts each produced outsized losses flagged as 3–6.5× median loss size. The account paid $18,788 in fees on $62.4m in closed trade volume, a 30 basis point drag that eroded an already thin margin.
The highest balance in this window was $11.0m on 1 July; the lowest was $9.84m on 3 June, a deepest decline in this window of -8.64%. The account has recovered to $10.77m as of the snapshot, but that recovery is entirely dependent on the XYZ100 position not deteriorating further.
Trade quality
Win rate is 45.83%, profit factor 0.74, expectancy -$637 per closed episode, and win/loss ratio 0.88. These numbers describe an account that loses money on average per trade and generates less than a dollar of profit for every dollar of loss. The 45% win rate is below breakeven threshold; the 0.74 profit factor means losses outweigh wins by a 26% margin. Expectancy of -$637 per episode is the mechanical outcome: the account closes trades at a loss and pays fees on the way.
Post-mortems
ETH long, 9–10 May 2026. Opened at $2,313.62, exited at $2,320.33 for -$15,699. This was the largest single loss in the data covered. The position reached $3.05m notional and was flagged as an oversized loser (6.51× median loss). Structural stop distance was 0.46% from entry; the trade moved 0.51% against the entry before closing. Duration was 16 hours. The trade had positive MFE of 0.54% but never recovered.
INTC short, 8 May 2026. Opened and closed on 8 May in 2.16 hours for -$9,414. No entry price is recorded. The position reached $294k notional and was flagged as an oversized loser (3.9× median loss). This was a rapid, high-leverage entry that failed immediately.
What the risk simulation reveals
Under a 1% stop-loss rule applied historically, the account would have realised $21,230 in PnL with a deepest decline in this window of -1.68%, stopping out 5 trades early. Under 2%, simulated PnL rises to $42,460 with a -3.29% deepest decline. Under 4%, simulated PnL reaches $84,920 with a -6.35% deepest decline. These are gross of fees. The simulation shows that mechanical stops would have prevented the largest losses and turned the account profitable; the actual account lacks stops entirely.
Open positions
The XYZ100 short is the dominant exposure by unrealised loss magnitude. Four other positions are open: ETH short ($1.14m notional, +$400 unrealised, 0.88% ROE, 25× leverage), BTC short ($1.28m notional, -$200 unrealised, -0.62% ROE, 40× leverage), and two micro longs in ARB and WLD totalling $61k notional with negligible unrealised PnL. NEAR long is also open at $44k notional with -$106 unrealised. None of the open positions have stops in place.
Honest summary
- Visible strength: BTC longs worked consistently (72.7% win rate, $19.3k profit). The account has identified an edge in one instrument and direction.
- Visible weakness: Shorts have zero edge (0% win rate, -$38.7k loss). The account has persisted in a losing direction across multiple instruments and has not adapted.
- Visible weakness: Oversized losers dominate the loss ledger. Four trades flagged as 3–6.5× median loss size account for $41.5k of the $70.9k realised loss. Position sizing is not calibrated to risk.
- Visible weakness: No stops are deployed on any open position, including the dominant XYZ100 short. The account is exposed to liquidation on the XYZ100 at $30,217 (0.19% below current mark) with no mechanical protection.
- Data scope: Only the most recent 10,000 fills are visible. Earlier account history is not available for analysis.
Behaviour checksRule-based warnings found in the trading history. They are not moral judgements; they mark patterns worth reviewing.
Rule-based position-cycle checks- BTC on May 9, 2026: re-entered at 80,378.14 after closing at 80,287.96 (May 9, 2026 prior close); outcome -$1,147.
- BTC on May 9, 2026: re-entered at 80,689.08 after closing at 80,378.91 (May 9, 2026 prior close); outcome $2,417.
- BTC on May 8, 2026: added to the position; while it was already moving against entry; outcome -$595.
- xyz:INTC: -$9,414 realised loss; 3.9x median closed loss.
- xyz:INTC: -$8,508 realised loss; 3.5x median closed loss.
- BTC on May 8, 2026: followed a -$776 loss; larger-than-normal size.
Expectancy is not a forecast. It is the historical average result per closed position cycle in this reconstructed sample.
Risk simulatorA counterfactual replay of the same historical trades using fixed risk limits. It is for comparing risk shape, not predicting future returns.
Replays the same closed position cycles with 1%, 2%, and 4% account-risk sizing. It shows what the wallet would have made or lost if each eligible cycle was sized from account value at entry and a structural stop.
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- -1.7%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 5
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- -3.3%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 5
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- -6.3%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 5
The 1%, 2%, and 4% rules are account-risk limits per position cycle, not leverage settings. If the simulated stop is breached, the cycle is stopped early. Outputs are gross of fees and funding, so use them as risk-shape comparisons rather than exact alternate realised trading PnL.