- Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from Feb 28, 2026 to May 19, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
- The sample is too small—one closed trade and four open positions—to support behavioural or pattern analysis.
- The closed BTC long generated $220,773 realised profit on a $3.67M notional position held 750 hours, entry 65515, exit 69134.
0x4044570e13b5184f7eb2709de25a4eb766a4794c
0x4044...794c wallet audit
0x4044...794c audit. $220,773 realised trading PnL across 1 closed position cycles, using the latest 10,000 public fills from Feb 28, 2026 to May 19, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit.
The dollar PnL is the realised result from closed trades in the data covered. The percentage uses an inferred starting value (current account value $3,240,316 minus closed trading PnL $220,773 = starting estimate $3,019,543). This audit does not ingest a deposit or withdrawal ledger, so it can show that trades lost money, but it cannot prove whether the owner also moved funds in or out. Older fills may also exist outside the latest 10,000-fill window.
This is not a fixed last-week or last-month period. It is the actual span covered by the latest 10,000 public fills Hyperliquid exposed for this wallet. Because the public fill source hit its cap, older trades may exist but are not included here.
- Public fills
- 10,000
- Position cycles
- 1 closed, 4 open
- Limit
- latest 10,000 fills only
- One closed trade was profitable and used a structural ATR-based stop, suggesting some risk discipline in that instance.
- Both major open positions lack stops despite high leverage, creating unmanaged tail risk.
- The sample is too small to draw conclusions about consistency, edge, or decision-making patterns.
Bottom line up front
Only the most recent public fills are visible, so this audit covers the data covered rather than full account history. The sample is too small—one closed trade and four open positions—to support behavioural or pattern analysis. The closed BTC long generated $220,773 realised profit on a $3.67M notional position held 750 hours, entry 65515, exit 69134. Two open positions now dominate the wallet: a BTC long at 77862 with 40× leverage showing $460k unrealised loss, and a HYPE long at 42.88 with 10× leverage showing $465k unrealised gain. Neither position has a stop in place. The account is profitable in the data covered at +7.31%, but that figure is entirely dependent on the outcome of two large open trades that remain unsettled.
What the data shows
The data covered spans 79 days from late February to mid-May 2026. One closed episode: a BTC long opened 1 March at 65515, closed 1 April at 69134, generating $220,773 profit on $3.67M notional with 40× leverage. The position ran for 750 hours and used an ATR-14 structural stop 1.36% below entry.
Four positions remain open. The BTC long entered at 77862 with 40× leverage is underwater by $460,157. The HYPE long entered at 42.88 with 10× leverage is ahead by $464,981. Two other open positions exist but are not detailed in the evidence pack. Neither the BTC nor HYPE position has a stop order attached.
Realised PnL totals $1,017,838 gross, but this figure includes the closed BTC trade ($220,773) plus what appears to be realised gains from partial closes or liquidations on the open positions. Gross fees paid are $20,023 on $72.6M gross volume, a fee rate of 0.028%. Net fee drag matches gross fees, indicating no rebates in the data covered.
The account holds $3.24M current balance. The two largest open positions are directionally opposed in unrealised terms—one deeply red, one deeply green—but both are leveraged and neither is hedged with a stop.
Trade quality
Win rate is 100% on the single closed episode. Profit factor is infinite—no closed losses recorded. Expectancy cannot be computed from one trade. The closed BTC long was profitable, but the sample is too small to infer edge or consistency from a single closed trade.
Open positions
BTC long dominates the open book: $77,862 entry, 40× leverage, $460,157 unrealised loss, no stop in place. Liquidation price is not provided. HYPE long: $42.88 entry, 10× leverage, $464,981 unrealised gain, no stop in place. Two additional open positions are recorded but not detailed. Neither position has downside protection.
Honest summary
- One closed trade was profitable and used a structural ATR-based stop, suggesting some risk discipline in that instance.
- Both major open positions lack stops despite high leverage, creating unmanaged tail risk.
- The sample is too small to draw conclusions about consistency, edge, or decision-making patterns.
Behaviour checksRule-based warnings found in the trading history. They are not moral judgements; they mark patterns worth reviewing.
Rule-based position-cycle checksNo matching position cycles in the data covered.
No matching position cycles in the data covered.
No matching position cycles in the data covered.
No matching position cycles in the data covered.
Expectancy is not a forecast. It is the historical average result per closed position cycle in this reconstructed sample.
Risk simulatorA counterfactual replay of the same historical trades using fixed risk limits. It is for comparing risk shape, not predicting future returns.
Replays the same closed position cycles with 1%, 2%, and 4% account-risk sizing. It shows what the wallet would have made or lost if each eligible cycle was sized from account value at entry and a structural stop.
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- 0.0%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 0
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- 0.0%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 0
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- 0.0%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 0
The 1%, 2%, and 4% rules are account-risk limits per position cycle, not leverage settings. If the simulated stop is breached, the cycle is stopped early. Outputs are gross of fees and funding, so use them as risk-shape comparisons rather than exact alternate realised trading PnL.