RRektrospect

0x4044570e13b5184f7eb2709de25a4eb766a4794c

0x4044...794c wallet audit

0x4044...794c audit. $220,773 realised trading PnL across 1 closed position cycles, using the latest 10,000 public fills from Feb 28, 2026 to May 19, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit.

limited sampleLimited sample: only 1 closed position cycles are visible in the data covered (Feb 28, 2026 to May 19, 2026). Raw metrics are shown, but behavioural conclusions stay caveated until there are at least 10 closed cycles. Classification basis: closed net pnl after fees available window.latest 10,000 fillsHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering Feb 28, 2026 to May 19, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.
ModeProfessional keeps the tone factual. Roast uses the same numbers but writes the commentary more sharply.
ProfessionalRoast
Max drawdownLargest fall from a previous balance high to a later low inside the data covered: Feb 28, 2026 to May 19, 2026.-52.8%1 closed position cycles
Win rateShare of closed position cycles that ended positive. Profit factor compares total winning realised PnL with total losing realised PnL.+100.0%inf profit factor
Total volumeGross notional traded across 10,000 reconstructed public fills. A position cycle can contain many individual fills.$72,624,3065 position cycles
Trading PnL vs transfersRealised trading PnL comes from Hyperliquid closed-fill profit and loss. Deposits and withdrawals can change account value, but they are not counted as trading PnL here.

The dollar PnL is the realised result from closed trades in the data covered. The percentage uses an inferred starting value (current account value $3,240,316 minus closed trading PnL $220,773 = starting estimate $3,019,543). This audit does not ingest a deposit or withdrawal ledger, so it can show that trades lost money, but it cannot prove whether the owner also moved funds in or out. Older fills may also exist outside the latest 10,000-fill window.

Data coveredHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering Feb 28, 2026 to May 19, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.Feb 28, 2026 to May 19, 2026

This is not a fixed last-week or last-month period. It is the actual span covered by the latest 10,000 public fills Hyperliquid exposed for this wallet. Because the public fill source hit its cap, older trades may exist but are not included here.

Public fills
10,000
Position cycles
1 closed, 4 open
Limit
latest 10,000 fills only
Equity curveA historical line showing how the wallet balance moved across the data covered: Feb 28, 2026 to May 19, 2026. It is not a prediction.$3,240,316
latest fills onlyHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering Feb 28, 2026 to May 19, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.
Equity curve by date and account valueX-axis shows date. Y-axis shows account value in US dollars. The line starts at Apr 1 with $3.2M and ends at Apr 1 with $3.2M.Account value (USD)Date$3.2MApr 1
Audit summaryA short extract from the full trader analysis below. It is built from the stored numbers and evidence pack.What matters immediately
  • Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from Feb 28, 2026 to May 19, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
  • The sample is too small—one closed trade and four open positions—to support behavioural or pattern analysis.
  • The closed BTC long generated $220,773 realised profit on a $3.67M notional position held 750 hours, entry 65515, exit 69134.
Analysis readoutA plain-language interpretation layer from the trader analysis. Use the cards and tables below for the raw evidence.Strengths & weaknesses
  • One closed trade was profitable and used a structural ATR-based stop, suggesting some risk discipline in that instance.
  • Both major open positions lack stops despite high leverage, creating unmanaged tail risk.
  • The sample is too small to draw conclusions about consistency, edge, or decision-making patterns.
Trader analysisThis is the full written analysis for this wallet and mode. The metrics, flags, simulator, and tables below are the supporting evidence.Full trader analysis

Bottom line up front

Only the most recent public fills are visible, so this audit covers the data covered rather than full account history. The sample is too small—one closed trade and four open positions—to support behavioural or pattern analysis. The closed BTC long generated $220,773 realised profit on a $3.67M notional position held 750 hours, entry 65515, exit 69134. Two open positions now dominate the wallet: a BTC long at 77862 with 40× leverage showing $460k unrealised loss, and a HYPE long at 42.88 with 10× leverage showing $465k unrealised gain. Neither position has a stop in place. The account is profitable in the data covered at +7.31%, but that figure is entirely dependent on the outcome of two large open trades that remain unsettled.

What the data shows

The data covered spans 79 days from late February to mid-May 2026. One closed episode: a BTC long opened 1 March at 65515, closed 1 April at 69134, generating $220,773 profit on $3.67M notional with 40× leverage. The position ran for 750 hours and used an ATR-14 structural stop 1.36% below entry.

Four positions remain open. The BTC long entered at 77862 with 40× leverage is underwater by $460,157. The HYPE long entered at 42.88 with 10× leverage is ahead by $464,981. Two other open positions exist but are not detailed in the evidence pack. Neither the BTC nor HYPE position has a stop order attached.

Realised PnL totals $1,017,838 gross, but this figure includes the closed BTC trade ($220,773) plus what appears to be realised gains from partial closes or liquidations on the open positions. Gross fees paid are $20,023 on $72.6M gross volume, a fee rate of 0.028%. Net fee drag matches gross fees, indicating no rebates in the data covered.

The account holds $3.24M current balance. The two largest open positions are directionally opposed in unrealised terms—one deeply red, one deeply green—but both are leveraged and neither is hedged with a stop.

Trade quality

Win rate is 100% on the single closed episode. Profit factor is infinite—no closed losses recorded. Expectancy cannot be computed from one trade. The closed BTC long was profitable, but the sample is too small to infer edge or consistency from a single closed trade.

Open positions

BTC long dominates the open book: $77,862 entry, 40× leverage, $460,157 unrealised loss, no stop in place. Liquidation price is not provided. HYPE long: $42.88 entry, 10× leverage, $464,981 unrealised gain, no stop in place. Two additional open positions are recorded but not detailed. Neither position has downside protection.

Honest summary

  • One closed trade was profitable and used a structural ATR-based stop, suggesting some risk discipline in that instance.
  • Both major open positions lack stops despite high leverage, creating unmanaged tail risk.
  • The sample is too small to draw conclusions about consistency, edge, or decision-making patterns.

Behaviour checksRule-based warnings found in the trading history. They are not moral judgements; they mark patterns worth reviewing.

Rule-based position-cycle checks
FOMO re-entryReopened the same market and direction soon after a winning close, but at a worse entry.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

Averaging downAdded size while the position was already moving against the entry.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

Oversized loserA losing position cycle more than 3x the wallet's median closed loss.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

Revenge tradeOpened a larger-than-normal position within one hour after a closed loss.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

ExpectancyAverage result per closed position cycle after wins and losses are blended. Positive means each completed cycle added money on average.$220,773.18
Fees / realised PnLFees as a share of realised trading PnL. High values mean execution cost is eating a meaningful part of the edge.+2.0%
Maker fill rateShare of fills that added liquidity rather than crossed the spread. Higher maker share usually means more patient execution.+37.3%

Expectancy is not a forecast. It is the historical average result per closed position cycle in this reconstructed sample.

Risk simulatorA counterfactual replay of the same historical trades using fixed risk limits. It is for comparing risk shape, not predicting future returns.

Replays the same closed position cycles with 1%, 2%, and 4% account-risk sizing. It shows what the wallet would have made or lost if each eligible cycle was sized from account value at entry and a structural stop.

1% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 1% of account value at the simulated stop.$22,325
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
0.0%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
0
2% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 2% of account value at the simulated stop.$44,650
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
0.0%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
0
4% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 4% of account value at the simulated stop.$89,300
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
0.0%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
0

The 1%, 2%, and 4% rules are account-risk limits per position cycle, not leverage settings. If the simulated stop is breached, the cycle is stopped early. Outputs are gross of fees and funding, so use them as risk-shape comparisons rather than exact alternate realised trading PnL.

No simulator curve yetThis wallet has 1 simulated close with usable stop and candle data. The cards above are scenario totals; a time-series curve needs at least two simulated closes.

Top lossesThe largest realised losing position cycles in the data covered by this audit.

Click a row for the trade breakdown
MarketThe traded Hyperliquid market or coin.SideLong means the wallet benefited if price rose. Short means it benefited if price fell.SizeLargest notional exposure reached during the reconstructed position cycle.PnLRealised profit or loss when the position cycle closed.DateClosed date when available; otherwise the cycle open date.

Top winsThe largest realised winning position cycles in the data covered by this audit.

Realised position-cycle outcomes
MarketThe traded Hyperliquid market or coin.SideLong means the wallet benefited if price rose. Short means it benefited if price fell.SizeLargest notional exposure reached during the reconstructed position cycle.PnLRealised profit or loss when the position cycle closed.DateClosed date when available; otherwise the cycle open date.
BTClong$3,668,747$220,7732026-04-01

By marketBreaks the audit down by traded market or coin so you can see which markets helped or hurt the account.

Realised results by coin
CoinThe traded Hyperliquid market.CyclesClosed reconstructed position cycles for this market. One cycle can contain many fills.WinShare of that market's closed position cycles that ended positive.PnLRealised PnL attributed to this market's closed position cycles in the data covered by this audit.
BTC1+100.0%$220,773
Share this audit on X