RRektrospect

0xa2ce501d9c0c5e23d34272f84402cfb7835b3126

0xa2ce...3126 wallet audit

0xa2ce...3126 audit. -$3,132,326 realised trading PnL across 36 closed position cycles, using the latest 10,000 public fills from Dec 17, 2025 to Jul 8, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit.

loss-dominatedA quick bucket assigned from realised trading PnL, closed position-cycle count, and whether the public fill source was capped. Data covered: Dec 17, 2025 to Jul 8, 2026. Classification basis: closed net pnl after fees available window.latest 10,000 fillsHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering Dec 17, 2025 to Jul 8, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.
ModeProfessional keeps the tone factual. Roast uses the same numbers but writes the commentary more sharply.
ProfessionalRoast
Max drawdownLargest fall from a previous balance high to a later low inside the data covered: Dec 17, 2025 to Jul 8, 2026.-94.3%36 closed position cycles
Win rateShare of closed position cycles that ended positive. Profit factor compares total winning realised PnL with total losing realised PnL.+13.9%0.26 profit factor
Total volumeGross notional traded across 10,000 reconstructed public fills. A position cycle can contain many individual fills.$76,603,69569 position cycles
Trading PnL vs transfersRealised trading PnL comes from Hyperliquid closed-fill profit and loss. Deposits and withdrawals can change account value, but they are not counted as trading PnL here.

The dollar PnL is the realised result from closed trades in the data covered. The percentage uses an inferred starting value (current account value $8,049,570 minus closed trading PnL -$3,132,326 = starting estimate $11,181,897). This audit does not ingest a deposit or withdrawal ledger, so it can show that trades lost money, but it cannot prove whether the owner also moved funds in or out. Older fills may also exist outside the latest 10,000-fill window.

Data coveredHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering Dec 17, 2025 to Jul 8, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.Dec 17, 2025 to Jul 8, 2026

This is not a fixed last-week or last-month period. It is the actual span covered by the latest 10,000 public fills Hyperliquid exposed for this wallet. Because the public fill source hit its cap, older trades may exist but are not included here.

Public fills
10,000
Position cycles
36 closed, 33 open
Limit
latest 10,000 fills only
Equity curveA historical line showing how the wallet balance moved across the data covered: Dec 17, 2025 to Jul 8, 2026. It is not a prediction.$8,049,570
latest fills onlyHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering Dec 17, 2025 to Jul 8, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.
Equity curve by date and account valueX-axis shows date. Y-axis shows account value in US dollars. The line starts at Dec 17 with $11M and ends at Jul 8 with $8M.Account value (USD)Date$11M$9.5M$7.9MDec 17Jan 31Jul 8
Audit summaryA short extract from the full trader analysis below. It is built from the stored numbers and evidence pack.What matters immediately
  • Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from Dec 17, 2025 to Jul 8, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
  • This account is -28.01% ($3.13M loss) in the data covered, with a highest balance in this window of $14.8M on 2026-01-28 and a lowest balance in this window of $854K on 2026-02-18—a deepest decline in this window of -94.25%.
  • The core problem is asymmetric edge: shorts on oil futures worked (795% profit factor on CL and BRENTOIL), but long-side conviction trades failed systematically, with five oversized losses consuming all gains and then some.
Analysis readoutA plain-language interpretation layer from the trader analysis. Use the cards and tables below for the raw evidence.Strengths & weaknesses
  • Shorts on oil futures showed genuine edge: 100% win rate on CL and BRENTOIL, closed within 195 hours, disciplined ATR-based stops, 795% profit factor. This is the only repeatable pattern in the data.
  • Long-side conviction is a liability: 6.67% win rate, $3.94M loss, no structural stops, averaging down into losers, revenge trades after drawdowns. The account should not trade long positions.
  • Oversized positions and no stops amplified losses: The two largest losses (HYPE and MRVL) reached $1.98M and $1.51M notional respectively and were held for 45 and 30 days
Trader analysisThis is the full written analysis for this wallet and mode. The metrics, flags, simulator, and tables below are the supporting evidence.Full trader analysis

Bottom line up front

Only the most recent public fills are visible, so this audit covers the data covered rather than full account history. This account is -28.01% ($3.13M loss) in the data covered, with a highest balance in this window of $14.8M on 2026-01-28 and a lowest balance in this window of $854K on 2026-02-18—a deepest decline in this window of -94.25%. The core problem is asymmetric edge: shorts on oil futures worked (795% profit factor on CL and BRENTOIL), but long-side conviction trades failed systematically, with five oversized losses consuming all gains and then some. Averaging down on losing positions and revenge trades after large drawdowns compounded the damage.

What the data shows

The account opened with $11.2M in early December 2025 and reached $14.8M by late January 2026, suggesting an initial profitable run. That highest balance in this window was illusory. By mid-February, the account had collapsed to $854K—a loss of $14M in three weeks. The recovery from that lowest balance in this window has been partial and fragile; current balance sits at $8.05M.

The profit/loss split is stark. Shorts on crude oil (CL) and Brent oil (BRENTOIL) generated $795K in realised gains across two episodes in early April 2026, both closed within 195 hours with disciplined ATR-based stops. Long positions across 34 closed episodes lost $3.94M. The two largest single losses—HYPE ($1.12M, closed 2026-01-31) and MRVL ($390K, closed 2026-07-08)—account for 43% of total realised losses. Both were held for over 700 hours and both were re-entered after earlier losses in the same coin, suggesting emotional decision-making rather than systematic edge.

Fees paid total $11.4K on $37.3M in closed trade volume, a negligible drag on the headline PnL. The real cost is in position sizing and hold duration. The account held positions at 5–20x leverage across BTC, ETH, SOL, HYPE, and SUI for 160+ days in some cases, accumulating $1.1M in funding costs on open positions alone. Realised PnL is -$4.91M; unrealised PnL on current open positions is -$1.66M, meaning the account is underwater on both closed and open books.

Long versus short asymmetry is the defining feature: long positions won 6.67% of the time and lost $3.94M; short positions won 50% of the time and gained $807K. The account has no edge on the long side and should not be trading it.

Trade quality

Win rate is 13.89% across 36 closed episodes. Profit factor is 0.26—for every dollar won, the account lost $3.85. Expectancy is -$87K per trade. Win/loss ratio is 1.59 (average win $216.7K, average loss $136K), which is positive in isolation but meaningless when applied to a 13.89% win rate and a 0.26 profit factor. The account is losing money on nearly 9 out of 10 closed trades.

The max loss streak is 17 consecutive losses. The max win streak is 3. This is not variance; this is a broken system applied to the long side.

Post-mortems

HYPE long, opened 2025-12-17, closed 2026-01-31, -$1.12M loss.

This was the largest single loss in the data covered. The position reached a max notional of $1.98M and was held for 1,081 hours (45 days). The account closed it at $24.52 after it had collapsed from entry. This trade is flagged as an oversized loser and was the trigger for subsequent revenge trades. No structural stop was in place.

MRVL long, opened 2026-06-08, closed 2026-07-08, -$390K loss.

Opened as a revenge trade immediately after a $37.9K loss on XYZ100 short on the same day. Max notional reached $1.51M; held for 727 hours. Closed at $243.50. Flagged as both oversized loser and revenge trade. The pattern is clear: after a small loss, the account sized up aggressively into a different coin and held through a 30% decline without exiting.

What the risk simulation reveals

Under a 1% hard stop rule applied historically, the account would have realised -$120K with a max decline in this window of -3.2%, winning 33.33% of trades. Under 2%, the loss would be -$241K with a -6.31% decline. Under 4%, the loss would be -$481K with a -12.25% decline. All three scenarios assume stops were actually executed; the data shows zero stops in place on any current open position. The simulator reveals that position sizing and stop discipline are the only levers that would have prevented the -94% decline. The account's actual behaviour—no stops, averaging down, holding through 700+ hour drawdowns—is the inverse of what the simulator shows would have worked.

Open positions

BTC long dominates the open book: $10.29M notional, -$4.9K unrealised (-0.95% ROE), 20x leverage, cross margin, liquidation at $32,636. This position is still open; the outcome is unknown until closed, and the liquidation level remains the downside boundary.

ETH long is the second-largest exposure: $9.0M notional, -$362K unrealised (-38.67% ROE), 10x leverage, held since 2026-01-31 (160 days). This position is deeply underwater and has accumulated $694K in funding costs data-covered.

SOL long: $3.12M notional, +$11.8K unrealised (+1.89% ROE), 5x leverage, held 160 days. This is the only open position with positive unrealised PnL.

SUI long: $2.43M notional, -$389K unrealised (-138% ROE), 10x leverage, held 15 days. This is a recent addition and is already severely underwater.

HYPE long: $10.12M notional, -$469K unrealised (-22.15% ROE), 5x leverage, held 160 days, liquidation at $32.47. This is the same coin that generated the largest historical loss; the account is re-holding it at a lower entry but with no structural stop.

No stops are in place on any of the five open positions. Total open notional is $46.4M against a $8.05M account balance. Total unrealised loss is -$1.66M. Funding costs on open positions total $60.9K since entry on BTC and $76.4K on ETH alone.

Honest summary

  • Shorts on oil futures showed genuine edge: 100% win rate on CL and BRENTOIL, closed within 195 hours, disciplined ATR-based stops, 795% profit factor. This is the only repeatable pattern in the data.
  • Long-side conviction is a liability: 6.67% win rate, $3.94M loss, no structural stops, averaging down into losers, revenge trades after drawdowns. The account should not trade long positions.
  • Oversized positions and no stops amplified losses: The two largest losses (HYPE and MRVL) reached $1.98M and $1.51M notional respectively and were held for 45 and 30 days

Behaviour checksRule-based warnings found in the trading history. They are not moral judgements; they mark patterns worth reviewing.

Rule-based position-cycle checks
FOMO re-entryReopened the same market and direction soon after a winning close, but at a worse entry.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

Averaging downAdded size while the position was already moving against the entry.
3
Examples
  • xyz:CL on Apr 12, 2026: added to the position; while it was already moving against entry; outcome $243,103.
  • xyz:XYZ100 on May 5, 2026: added to the position; while it was already moving against entry; outcome -$38.
+1 more matching cycle
Oversized loserA losing position cycle more than 3x the wallet's median closed loss.
2
Examples
  • HYPE: -$1,118,833 realised loss; 11.4x median closed loss.
  • xyz:MRVL: -$389,647 realised loss; 4x median closed loss.
Revenge tradeOpened a larger-than-normal position within one hour after a closed loss.
5
Examples
  • xyz:AMD on May 5, 2026: followed a -$38 loss; larger-than-normal size.
  • xyz:MU on Jun 5, 2026: followed a -$18,430 loss; larger-than-normal size.
+3 more matching cycles
ExpectancyAverage result per closed position cycle after wins and losses are blended. Positive means each completed cycle added money on average.-$87,009.06
Fees / realised PnLFees as a share of realised trading PnL. High values mean execution cost is eating a meaningful part of the edge.n/a
Maker fill rateShare of fills that added liquidity rather than crossed the spread. Higher maker share usually means more patient execution.+47.4%

Expectancy is not a forecast. It is the historical average result per closed position cycle in this reconstructed sample.

Risk simulatorA counterfactual replay of the same historical trades using fixed risk limits. It is for comparing risk shape, not predicting future returns.

Replays the same closed position cycles with 1%, 2%, and 4% account-risk sizing. It shows what the wallet would have made or lost if each eligible cycle was sized from account value at entry and a structural stop.

1% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 1% of account value at the simulated stop.-$120,281
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
-3.2%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
4
2% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 2% of account value at the simulated stop.-$240,561
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
-6.3%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
4
4% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 4% of account value at the simulated stop.-$481,122
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
-12.3%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
4

The 1%, 2%, and 4% rules are account-risk limits per position cycle, not leverage settings. If the simulated stop is breached, the cycle is stopped early. Outputs are gross of fees and funding, so use them as risk-shape comparisons rather than exact alternate realised trading PnL.

Equity curve by date and account valueX-axis shows date. Y-axis shows account value in US dollars. The line starts at Apr 10 with $7.1M and ends at May 11 with $6.8M.Account value (USD)Date$7.2M$7M$6.8MApr 10May 8May 11

Top lossesThe largest realised losing position cycles in the data covered by this audit.

Click a row for the trade breakdown
MarketThe traded Hyperliquid market or coin.SideLong means the wallet benefited if price rose. Short means it benefited if price fell.SizeLargest notional exposure reached during the reconstructed position cycle.PnLRealised profit or loss when the position cycle closed.DateClosed date when available; otherwise the cycle open date.

Top winsThe largest realised winning position cycles in the data covered by this audit.

Realised position-cycle outcomes
MarketThe traded Hyperliquid market or coin.SideLong means the wallet benefited if price rose. Short means it benefited if price fell.SizeLargest notional exposure reached during the reconstructed position cycle.PnLRealised profit or loss when the position cycle closed.DateClosed date when available; otherwise the cycle open date.
xyz:CLshort$2,583,015$475,1572026-04-10
xyz:BRENTOILshort$2,121,000$320,1822026-04-10
xyz:CLlong$3,777,015$243,1032026-06-06
FARTCOINlong$836,296$32,4402026-01-31
ALGOshort$578,247$12,7332026-04-08

By marketBreaks the audit down by traded market or coin so you can see which markets helped or hurt the account.

Realised results by coin
CoinThe traded Hyperliquid market.CyclesClosed reconstructed position cycles for this market. One cycle can contain many fills.WinShare of that market's closed position cycles that ended positive.PnLRealised PnL attributed to this market's closed position cycles in the data covered by this audit.
HYPE10.0%-$1,118,833
xyz:CL2+100.0%$718,260
xyz:MRVL20.0%-$441,750
xyz:BRENTOIL1+100.0%$320,182
LTC10.0%-$250,379
ENA10.0%-$201,988
AVAX10.0%-$171,916
PUMP10.0%-$170,231
xyz:PLTR10.0%-$162,420
xyz:TSM10.0%-$159,468
xyz:MU20.0%-$135,635
ASTER10.0%-$133,320
APEX10.0%-$129,930
ETH10.0%-$128,994
IMX10.0%-$121,767
STRK10.0%-$104,758
MET10.0%-$103,251
kBONK10.0%-$98,314
LINK10.0%-$80,719
LINEA10.0%-$80,100
SOL10.0%-$78,133
POPCAT10.0%-$72,587
kPEPE10.0%-$62,193
PROMPT10.0%-$52,719
xyz:AMD20.0%-$43,337
PENGU10.0%-$42,058
BNB10.0%-$41,165
FARTCOIN1+100.0%$32,440
PNUT10.0%-$29,281
ALGO1+100.0%$12,733
xyz:SNDK10.0%-$656
xyz:XYZ10010.0%-$38
Share this audit on X