- Open BTC short dominates this wallet: $7,804,043 notional, $554,830 +132.8% unrealised, 20x cross, held at least 37 days, liquidation $88,138.
- Closed-trade context: -$915,906 realised trading PnL across 7 closed position cycles in the data covered.
- Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from May 31, 2026 to Jul 8, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
- The hold duration is a lower bound because the position was already open at the first visible fill for that market.
0xaea8e3bd369217cc6e3e6abddf0da318fba8e59b
0xaea8...e59b wallet audit
Open BTC short dominates this wallet: $7,804,043 notional, $554,830 +132.8% unrealised, 20x cross, held at least 37 days, liquidation $88,138. Closed trades are supporting context: -$915,906 realised trading PnL across 7 closed position cycles, using the latest 10,000 public fills from May 31, 2026 to Jul 8, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit.
Closed trades still matter, but they are not the main account story here. The closed-trade sample covers May 31, 2026 to Jul 8, 2026; the open-position figures are live account-state figures from Hyperliquid when the audit ran. The unrealised PnL is still open, not a locked result; liquidation at $88,138 remains the downside boundary for this position.
- Position
- BTC short
- Open PnL
- $554,830 (+132.8% ROE)
- Notional
- $7,804,043
- Liquidation
- $88,138
- Read this as
- entry $68,688 · mark $64,129 · held at least 37 days · 20x cross · $390,202 margin used
This audit is position-dominated, so open unrealised PnL is shown separately from closed realised trading PnL. The dollar PnL is the realised result from closed trades in the data covered. The percentage uses an inferred starting value (current account value $6,153,939 minus closed trading PnL -$915,906 = starting estimate $7,069,845). This audit does not ingest a deposit or withdrawal ledger, so it can show that trades lost money, but it cannot prove whether the owner also moved funds in or out. Older fills may also exist outside the latest 10,000-fill window.
This is not a fixed last-week or last-month period. It is the actual span covered by the latest 10,000 public fills Hyperliquid exposed for this wallet. Because the public fill source hit its cap, older trades may exist but are not included here.
- Public fills
- 10,000
- Position cycles
- 7 closed, 8 open
- Limit
- latest 10,000 fills only
- Open BTC short dominates this wallet: $7,804,043 notional, $554,830 +132.8% unrealised, 20x cross, held at least 37 days, liquidation $88,138.
- Closed-trade context: -$915,906 realised trading PnL across 7 closed position cycles in the data covered.
- Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from May 31, 2026 to Jul 8, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
- The hold duration is a lower bound because the position was already open at the first visible fill for that market.
Bottom line up front
Open BTC short dominates this wallet: $7.8M notional, $554.8k unrealised gain, 132.75% unrealised ROE, 20x cross leverage, held 37 days, liquidation at $88,137.96. This is still open exposure; the unrealised PnL is not locked in, and the final outcome is unknown until the position closes. The liquidation price sits $24k above current mark, providing a defined downside boundary. The account is -12.96% realised in the data covered, but the open position has masked a severe closed-trade loss of $1.1M across seven completed episodes. Sample is too small to draw behavioural conclusions from closed trades alone.
Only the most recent public fills are visible, so this audit covers the data covered rather than full account history.
What the data shows
The account opened on 31 May 2026 and has completed seven trades while holding eight open positions across BTC, ETH, and OP. The closed-trade record is stark: $1.1M realised loss against $5.9M gross closed volume, a 18.5% loss rate on completed episodes. The two largest losses—a $611k short on ANTHROPIC (opened 1 June, closed 15 June) and a $442k short on MU (opened 31 May, closed 1 June)—account for $1.05M of the damage. The ANTHROPIC trade carried a revenge-trade flag and ran against a 0.97% structural stop distance before being closed at a 2.84% maximum adverse excursion.
The open book tells a different story. Three short positions—BTC, ETH, and OP—carry combined unrealised gains of $1.47M. The BTC short, entered at $68,688 on 3 June, has accrued $554.8k in unrealised profit as the mark has fallen to $64,129. The OP short, with no visible entry date in the data covered, shows the largest ROE at 458.01% on a 5x position, though notional exposure is modest at $28k. ETH short contributes $8.3k unrealised. Funding has been a net drag: $57.8k paid on BTC, $4.8k on ETH, and $5.2k on OP, totalling $67.8k in funding costs across the open book.
Win rate on closed trades is 71.43%, but this masks the severity of the two largest losses. The two winning trades—a $51.4k short on MU (closed 7 July) and a $45.5k short on SPCX (closed 10 June)—are dwarfed by the two catastrophic losses. Fees paid total $379.73, negligible against the scale of realised losses.
Trade quality
Win rate of 71.43% is misleading when two losses consume the entire edge. The account has won four of seven closed episodes, but the profit factor is deeply negative: realised losses of $1.1M against realised gains of $86k. Expectancy per closed trade is -$157k. The structural stop on the ANTHROPIC trade was tight at 0.97% distance, yet the position was allowed to run 2.84% into maximum adverse excursion before being closed. Sample is too small to isolate whether this reflects stop discipline or reactive exit behaviour.
Post-mortems
ANTHROPIC short, 1–15 June. Entered at $1,677.23, exited at $1,618.90, loss of $611.3k on a $1.51M notional position. Held 345 hours. The trade carried a revenge-trade flag and hit 5.45% maximum favourable excursion before reversing into a 2.84% maximum adverse excursion. The structural stop was set at 0.97% distance,
Behaviour checksRule-based warnings found in the trading history. They are not moral judgements; they mark patterns worth reviewing.
Rule-based position-cycle checksNo matching position cycles in the data covered.
No matching position cycles in the data covered.
No matching position cycles in the data covered.
- vntl:ANTHROPIC on Jun 1, 2026: followed a -$442,125 loss; larger-than-normal size.
Expectancy is not a forecast. It is the historical average result per closed position cycle in this reconstructed sample.
Risk simulatorA counterfactual replay of the same historical trades using fixed risk limits. It is for comparing risk shape, not predicting future returns.
Replays the same closed position cycles with 1%, 2%, and 4% account-risk sizing. It shows what the wallet would have made or lost if each eligible cycle was sized from account value at entry and a structural stop.
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- -1.1%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 1
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- -2.1%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 1
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- -4.3%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 1
The 1%, 2%, and 4% rules are account-risk limits per position cycle, not leverage settings. If the simulated stop is breached, the cycle is stopped early. Outputs are gross of fees and funding, so use them as risk-shape comparisons rather than exact alternate realised trading PnL.