RRektrospect

0xaea8e3bd369217cc6e3e6abddf0da318fba8e59b

0xaea8...e59b wallet audit

Open BTC short dominates this wallet: $5,010,552 notional, $1,045,856 +345.4% unrealised, 20x cross, held at least 2 days, liquidation $144,091. Closed trades are supporting context: -$666,420 realised trading PnL across 1 closed position cycles, using the latest 10,000 public fills from May 30, 2026 to Jun 5, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit.

limited sampleLimited sample: only 1 closed position cycles are visible in the data covered (May 30, 2026 to Jun 5, 2026). Raw metrics are shown, but behavioural conclusions stay caveated until there are at least 10 closed cycles. Classification basis: closed net pnl after fees available window.position-dominatedOpen unrealised PnL is more than 2x the absolute closed realised PnL ($666,420). The page leads with open exposure, and closed trades are supporting context.latest 10,000 fillsHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering May 30, 2026 to Jun 5, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.
ModeProfessional keeps the tone factual. Roast uses the same numbers but writes the commentary more sharply.
ProfessionalRoast
Read trader analysisShare on X
Dominant open positionThis wallet is led by live open exposure rather than closed trades. The trigger is open unrealised PnL greater than 2x closed realised PnL, or the largest open notional greater than closed-trade volume.Open BTC short dominates this wallet: $5,010,552 notional, $1,045,856 +345.4% unrealised, 20x cross, held at least 2 days, liquidation $144,091.

Closed trades still matter, but they are not the main account story here. The closed-trade sample covers May 30, 2026 to Jun 5, 2026; the open-position figures are live account-state figures from Hyperliquid when the audit ran. The unrealised PnL is still open, not a locked result; liquidation at $144,091 remains the downside boundary for this position.

Position
BTC short
Open PnL
$1,045,856 (+345.4% ROE)
Notional
$5,010,552
Liquidation
$144,091
Read this as
entry $74,136 · mark $61,334 · held at least 2 days · 20x cross · $250,528 margin used
Open unrealised PnLLive mark-to-market profit or loss on current open positions from Hyperliquid account state. It is not closed or banked.$3,172,787+345.4% ROE
Open notionalCurrent notional value of the open positions. When this dwarfs closed-trade activity, the open position is the wallet's main story.$11,543,569BTC short
LiquidationLiquidation price reported by Hyperliquid for the dominant open position when available.$144,09120x cross
Closed realised PnLClosed trading profit or loss after fees in the data covered: May 30, 2026 to Jun 5, 2026. This excludes the live unrealised PnL above.-$666,4201 closed cycles
Closed volumeGross notional from closed position cycles in the data covered. This is the comparison used to decide whether an open position dominates the wallet.$3,838,1769 total cycles
Trading PnL vs transfersRealised trading PnL comes from Hyperliquid closed-fill profit and loss. Deposits and withdrawals can change account value, but they are not counted as trading PnL here.

This audit is position-dominated, so open unrealised PnL is shown separately from closed realised trading PnL. The dollar PnL is the realised result from closed trades in the data covered. The percentage uses an inferred starting value (current account value $12,972,949 minus closed trading PnL -$666,420 = starting estimate $13,639,368). This audit does not ingest a deposit or withdrawal ledger, so it can show that trades lost money, but it cannot prove whether the owner also moved funds in or out. Older fills may also exist outside the latest 10,000-fill window.

Data coveredHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering May 30, 2026 to Jun 5, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.May 30, 2026 to Jun 5, 2026

This is not a fixed last-week or last-month period. It is the actual span covered by the latest 10,000 public fills Hyperliquid exposed for this wallet. Because the public fill source hit its cap, older trades may exist but are not included here.

Public fills
10,000
Position cycles
1 closed, 8 open
Limit
latest 10,000 fills only
Equity curveA historical line showing how the wallet balance moved across the data covered: May 30, 2026 to Jun 5, 2026. It is not a prediction.$12,972,949
latest fills onlyHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering May 30, 2026 to Jun 5, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.
Equity curve by date and account valueX-axis shows date. Y-axis shows account value in US dollars. The line starts at Jun 1 with $13M and ends at Jun 1 with $13M.Account value (USD)Date$13MJun 1
Audit summaryA short extract from the full trader analysis below. It is built from the stored numbers and evidence pack.What matters immediately
  • Open BTC short dominates this wallet: $5,010,552 notional, $1,045,856 +345.4% unrealised, 20x cross, held at least 2 days, liquidation $144,091.
  • Closed-trade context: -$666,420 realised trading PnL across 1 closed position cycles in the data covered.
  • Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from May 30, 2026 to Jun 5, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
  • The hold duration is a lower bound because the position was already open at the first visible fill for that market.
Analysis readoutA plain-language interpretation layer from the trader analysis. Use the cards and tables below for the raw evidence.Strengths & weaknesses
  • Open BTC short dominates this wallet: $5,010,552 notional, $1,045,856 +345.4% unrealised, 20x cross, held at least 2 days, liquidation $144,091.
  • Closed-trade context: -$666,420 realised trading PnL across 1 closed position cycles in the data covered.
  • Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from May 30, 2026 to Jun 5, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
  • The hold duration is a lower bound because the position was already open at the first visible fill for that market.
Trader analysisThis is the full written analysis for this wallet and mode. The metrics, flags, simulator, and tables below are the supporting evidence.Full trader analysis

Bottom line up front

Open BTC short dominates this wallet: $5,010,551.72 notional, $1,045,856.02 unrealised, 345.37% unrealised ROE, 20x cross margin, held 2 days, liquidation at $144,090.75. This is still open exposure; the unrealised PnL is not locked in, and the final outcome remains unknown until the position closes. The liquidation price sits $82,756.75 above current mark, representing the downside boundary. The data covered is extremely narrow—only 5 days of activity across 9 total episodes—so the sample is too small to draw behavioural conclusions. The account is loss-making in the data covered at -4.89% after fees, but that result is dominated by a single closed short that lost $666,419.54; the three current open positions carry $3.17m in unrealised gains that dwarf the closed loss.

What the data shows

The account opened on 30 May 2026 and has executed 9 episodes in 5 days of visible activity. Only one trade has closed: a short on xyz:MU entered on 30 May and exited on 1 June, held for 43.47 hours at a max notional of $3.78m, which realised a loss of $666,419.54. That single closed loss accounts for the entire -4.89% headline PnL and explains the negative pnl_direction classification.

Against that closed loss, three short positions remain open: BTC at 20x leverage entered at $74,136.20 on 3 June, ETH at 20x leverage entered at $2,066.62 on 3 June, and OP at 5x leverage with no visible entry timestamp. The BTC short alone carries $1,045,856.02 unrealised gain on a $5.01m notional position. The ETH short carries $159,011.57 unrealised, and the OP short carries $306,227.70 unrealised. Combined, the three open positions show $3.17m in unrealised gains—more than 4.7x the magnitude of the closed loss.

Gross fees paid total $275.99 on $8.6m in gross volume, a negligible drag. The realised PnL after fees is -$1,020,909.88, which reflects the xyz:MU loss plus funding costs on the open positions. Funding has cost $12,368.12 on the BTC short, $1,657.31 on ETH, and $5,335.89 on OP since entry—a total of $19,361.32 in funding drag across the three shorts.

Trade quality

The sample is too small to extract meaningful trade quality metrics. One closed episode exists: a short that lost money. Win rate is 0%. Profit factor is undefined because there are no winning closed trades. The single closed trade had no structural stop in place and no entry price recorded, making it impossible to assess position sizing discipline or risk management intent from the closed episode alone.

Post-mortems

xyz:MU short, 30 May – 1 June 2026: Entered on 30 May at an unrecorded entry price, exited on 1 June at $988.47 after 43.47 hours. The position reached a maximum notional of $3.78m and realised a loss of $666,419.54. No structural stop was in place. This is the only closed trade in the data covered and accounts for the entire realised loss.

Open positions

BTC short: $5.01m notional, 81.69 contracts at 20x cross margin, entered at $74,136.20 on 3 June, held 2 days. Current mark is $61,334.00, generating $1,045,856.02 unreal

Behaviour checksRule-based warnings found in the trading history. They are not moral judgements; they mark patterns worth reviewing.

Rule-based position-cycle checks
FOMO re-entryReopened the same market and direction soon after a winning close, but at a worse entry.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

Averaging downAdded size while the position was already moving against the entry.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

Oversized loserA losing position cycle more than 3x the wallet's median closed loss.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

Revenge tradeOpened a larger-than-normal position within one hour after a closed loss.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

ExpectancyAverage result per closed position cycle after wins and losses are blended. Positive means each completed cycle added money on average.-$666,419.54
Fees / realised PnLFees as a share of realised trading PnL. High values mean execution cost is eating a meaningful part of the edge.n/a
Maker fill rateShare of fills that added liquidity rather than crossed the spread. Higher maker share usually means more patient execution.+92.0%

Expectancy is not a forecast. It is the historical average result per closed position cycle in this reconstructed sample.

Risk simulatorA counterfactual replay of the same historical trades using fixed risk limits. It is for comparing risk shape, not predicting future returns.

Replays the same closed position cycles with 1%, 2%, and 4% account-risk sizing. It shows what the wallet would have made or lost if each eligible cycle was sized from account value at entry and a structural stop.

1% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 1% of account value at the simulated stop.$0
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
0.0%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
0
2% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 2% of account value at the simulated stop.$0
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
0.0%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
0
4% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 4% of account value at the simulated stop.$0
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
0.0%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
0

The 1%, 2%, and 4% rules are account-risk limits per position cycle, not leverage settings. If the simulated stop is breached, the cycle is stopped early. Outputs are gross of fees and funding, so use them as risk-shape comparisons rather than exact alternate realised trading PnL.

No simulator curve yetThis wallet has no simulated closes with usable stop and candle data. The cards above are scenario totals; a time-series curve needs at least two simulated closes.

Top lossesThe largest realised losing position cycles in the data covered by this audit.

Click a row for the trade breakdown
MarketThe traded Hyperliquid market or coin.SideLong means the wallet benefited if price rose. Short means it benefited if price fell.SizeLargest notional exposure reached during the reconstructed position cycle.PnLRealised profit or loss when the position cycle closed.DateClosed date when available; otherwise the cycle open date.

Top winsThe largest realised winning position cycles in the data covered by this audit.

Realised position-cycle outcomes
MarketThe traded Hyperliquid market or coin.SideLong means the wallet benefited if price rose. Short means it benefited if price fell.SizeLargest notional exposure reached during the reconstructed position cycle.PnLRealised profit or loss when the position cycle closed.DateClosed date when available; otherwise the cycle open date.

By marketBreaks the audit down by traded market or coin so you can see which markets helped or hurt the account.

Realised results by coin
CoinThe traded Hyperliquid market.CyclesClosed reconstructed position cycles for this market. One cycle can contain many fills.WinShare of that market's closed position cycles that ended positive.PnLRealised PnL attributed to this market's closed position cycles in the data covered by this audit.
xyz:MU10.0%-$666,420
Share this audit on X