- Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from May 6, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
- You finished up $209.74 on a $255,391 balance across 65 days of trading—technically profitable, but you paid $366.64 in fees to get there, meaning fees ate 175% of your gross edge.
- The highest balance in this window was $253,088.54 on 2026-07-03; the deepest decline in this window was -24.45% down to $104,287.82 on 2026-05-20.
0xc5ed4501500fcbfb2b88fb7f0aa52f834ed44346
0xc5ed...4346 wallet audit
0xc5ed...4346 audit. $210 realised trading PnL across 641 closed position cycles, using the latest 10,000 public fills from May 6, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit.
The dollar PnL is the realised result from closed trades in the data covered. The percentage uses an inferred starting value (current account value $255,392 minus closed trading PnL $210 = starting estimate $255,182). This audit does not ingest a deposit or withdrawal ledger, so it can show that trades lost money, but it cannot prove whether the owner also moved funds in or out. Older fills may also exist outside the latest 10,000-fill window.
This is not a fixed last-week or last-month period. It is the actual span covered by the latest 10,000 public fills Hyperliquid exposed for this wallet. Because the public fill source hit its cap, older trades may exist but are not included here.
- Public fills
- 10,000
- Position cycles
- 641 closed, 40 open
- Limit
- latest 10,000 fills only
- Short bias works. Shorts are +$267.56; longs are -$57.83. Your short win rate is 43.71% vs. long win rate of 39.32%. You're better at selling than buying, and the data shows it.
- Cash:INTC and xyz:INTC together are legitimate. 139 combined episodes, $414.32 combined realised PnL, 47.5% combined win rate. You have an instrument you understand.
- You survived a -24.45% deepest decline in this window and clawed back to flat. That's not nothing. Most traders don't recover from a $150k swing.
The opening paragraph
Only the most recent public fills are visible in this data covered. You finished up $209.74 on a $255,391 balance across 65 days of trading—technically profitable, but you paid $366.64 in fees to get there, meaning fees ate 175% of your gross edge. The highest balance in this window was $253,088.54 on 2026-07-03; the deepest decline in this window was -24.45% down to $104,287.82 on 2026-05-20. You're holding five open positions worth $47,376.73 notional, including a fresh PLTR long entered today at 126.688 with 4x leverage and a liquidation boundary at 100.02—unrealised loss of $6.19 already sitting on the books.
The greatest hits
- AMD twice in one day, both oversized, both red. On 2026-07-10 you shorted AMD at 553.46 for -$135.25 in 2.26 hours, then re-entered the same short at 555.56 and averaged down into -$62.33 in 24 minutes. Combined notional was $8.8m+; combined loss was -$197.58. The evidence pack flags both as revenge trades following earlier losses.
- WTI long on 2026-05-06 at 95.59 cost $33.14 and was 11.37x the median loss. You sized it like a conviction trade and got stopped for a fast bleed.
- Five re-entries after closed losses in the first 24 hours. TSLA, INTC (three times), and EWY all got the "one more shot" treatment. INTC re-entries actually clawed back $32.13 + $10.24 on two of them, but the pattern is visible: loss closes, price twitches, you're back in within seconds.
- Fees are 61.25% of your total PnL. You made $599.50 gross realised PnL; fees took $366.64. Your win rate is 41.5%, your profit factor is 1.09, and your average win ($10.05) is only 1.53x your average loss ($6.57). The math is thin.
- Cash:INTC is your only real edge: 83 episodes, $265.56 realised, 45.78% win rate. Everything else—AMD, SMSN, DRAM, CRCL, NVDA, ARM—is a no-edge or negative-edge grind. You're profitable because you traded one instrument 83 times and got lucky on sizing.
The pattern
You have a revenge-trade and re-entry reflex that fires within seconds of a closed loss. The behavioural flags list five re-entries, five revenge trades, and five averaging-down episodes, all clustered in the first 48 hours of the data covered. When a position closes red, the next trade is often in the same coin or a related one, at a similar price, within minutes. This isn't edge; it's emotional repair.
The reluctant compliments
- Short bias works. Shorts are +$267.56; longs are -$57.83. Your short win rate is 43.71% vs. long win rate of 39.32%. You're better at selling than buying, and the data shows it.
- Cash:INTC and xyz:INTC together are legitimate. 139 combined episodes, $414.32 combined realised PnL, 47.5% combined win rate. You have an instrument you understand.
- You survived a -24.45% deepest decline in this window and clawed back to flat. That's not nothing. Most traders don't recover from a $150k swing.
The verdict
You're profitable by $209.74 after fees, which is a rounding error on a $255k balance. You have one real edge (INTC), a short bias that works, and a revenge-trading habit that costs you $200+ per occurrence. The fees are eating your lunch. If you traded only INTC and cut the re-entries, you'd be up $400+. Instead, you're treading water on 641 closed episodes.
Behaviour checksRule-based warnings found in the trading history. They are not moral judgements; they mark patterns worth reviewing.
Rule-based position-cycle checks- cash:TSLA on May 6, 2026: re-entered at 397.42 after closing at 397.89 (May 6, 2026 prior close); outcome -$0.
- xyz:TSLA on May 7, 2026: re-entered at 397.16 after closing at 396.82 (May 7, 2026 prior close); outcome $2.
- xyz:INTC on May 6, 2026: added to the position; while it was already moving against entry; outcome $21.
- hyna:BTC on May 6, 2026: added to the position; while it was already moving against entry; outcome -$21.
- cash:HOOD: -$15 realised loss; 5x median closed loss.
- cash:EWY: -$14 realised loss; 5x median closed loss.
- xyz:COIN on May 6, 2026: followed a -$6 loss; larger-than-normal size.
- cash:INTC on May 6, 2026: followed a -$5 loss; larger-than-normal size.
Expectancy is not a forecast. It is the historical average result per closed position cycle in this reconstructed sample.
Risk simulatorA counterfactual replay of the same historical trades using fixed risk limits. It is for comparing risk shape, not predicting future returns.
Replays the same closed position cycles with 1%, 2%, and 4% account-risk sizing. It shows what the wallet would have made or lost if each eligible cycle was sized from account value at entry and a structural stop.
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- -5.1%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 8
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- -10.1%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 8
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- -19.9%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 8
The 1%, 2%, and 4% rules are account-risk limits per position cycle, not leverage settings. If the simulated stop is breached, the cycle is stopped early. Outputs are gross of fees and funding, so use them as risk-shape comparisons rather than exact alternate realised trading PnL.