- Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from Dec 30, 2025 to Apr 13, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
- The sample is too small to support behavioural conclusions.
- Only two episodes are visible in the data covered, both currently open: a short HYPE position at 10× leverage carrying $2.49M in unrealised losses against a $2.03M account balance, and one other open position.
0xdf9ea6ec3b7109935ccb4fb267e15ac1fb077ab1
0xdf9e...7ab1 wallet audit
0xdf9e...7ab1 audit. $0 realised trading PnL across 0 closed position cycles, using the latest 10,000 public fills from Dec 30, 2025 to Apr 13, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit.
The dollar PnL is the realised result from closed trades in the data covered. The percentage uses an inferred starting value (current account value $2,031,980 minus closed trading PnL $0 = starting estimate $2,031,980). This audit does not ingest a deposit or withdrawal ledger, so it can show that trades lost money, but it cannot prove whether the owner also moved funds in or out. Older fills may also exist outside the latest 10,000-fill window.
This is not a fixed last-week or last-month period. It is the actual span covered by the latest 10,000 public fills Hyperliquid exposed for this wallet. Because the public fill source hit its cap, older trades may exist but are not included here.
- Public fills
- 10,000
- Position cycles
- 0 closed, 2 open
- Limit
- latest 10,000 fills only
- Gross volume of $1.81M demonstrates active trading intent, but no closed trades means no execution record to assess.
- The HYPE short position is sized at 122% of account equity with no stop, creating acute liquidation exposure.
- The sample is too small to draw any conclusions about consistency, risk discipline, or trading edge.
Bottom line up front
The sample is too small to support behavioural conclusions. Only two episodes are visible in the data covered, both currently open: a short HYPE position at 10× leverage carrying $2.49M in unrealised losses against a $2.03M account balance, and one other open position. No closed trades exist in this window, so realised PnL is zero and fees are immaterial. The account is flat on realised basis, but the unrealised loss on HYPE alone represents 122% of current equity, creating acute liquidation risk.
What the data shows
The data covered spans 104 days from 30 December 2025 to 13 April 2026. Gross volume is $1.81M across two open episodes and zero closed trades. No realised profit or loss has been locked in. The short HYPE position was entered at $25.9443 and is now underwater by $2.49M at current mark. With 10× leverage on a $2.03M balance, the position notional is approximately $20.3M short—a size that leaves almost no margin for adverse movement. The second open position is not detailed in the available data.
Because the sample is too small, no meaningful patterns about entry discipline, exit timing, or risk management can be inferred from two open trades. The account has not yet closed a single position, so there is no win rate, no profit factor, and no realised expectancy to evaluate.
Trade quality
Win rate, profit factor, and expectancy are undefined; no closed episodes exist. Gross fees paid are zero. Net fee drag is negative $54.39, indicating a small rebate. These metrics are not actionable on a two-trade sample.
Open positions
HYPE short dominates: $20.3M notional short at 10× leverage, entered at $25.9443, carrying $2.49M unrealised loss. No stop is in place. The unrealised loss remains open and unresolved; the outcome is unknown until the position is closed or liquidated. At current leverage and balance, liquidation risk is material.
A second open position exists but is not detailed in the available data.
Honest summary
- Gross volume of $1.81M demonstrates active trading intent, but no closed trades means no execution record to assess.
- The HYPE short position is sized at 122% of account equity with no stop, creating acute liquidation exposure.
- The sample is too small to draw any conclusions about consistency, risk discipline, or trading edge.
Behaviour checksRule-based warnings found in the trading history. They are not moral judgements; they mark patterns worth reviewing.
Rule-based position-cycle checksNo matching position cycles in the data covered.
No matching position cycles in the data covered.
No matching position cycles in the data covered.
No matching position cycles in the data covered.
Expectancy is not a forecast. It is the historical average result per closed position cycle in this reconstructed sample.
Risk simulatorA counterfactual replay of the same historical trades using fixed risk limits. It is for comparing risk shape, not predicting future returns.
Replays the same closed position cycles with 1%, 2%, and 4% account-risk sizing. It shows what the wallet would have made or lost if each eligible cycle was sized from account value at entry and a structural stop.
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- 0.0%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 0
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- 0.0%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 0
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- 0.0%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 0
The 1%, 2%, and 4% rules are account-risk limits per position cycle, not leverage settings. If the simulated stop is breached, the cycle is stopped early. Outputs are gross of fees and funding, so use them as risk-shape comparisons rather than exact alternate realised trading PnL.