RRektrospect

0xe357fa9fecb084f0303ff341b0bc55c89f2bb5ce

0xe357...b5ce wallet audit

0xe357...b5ce audit. -$71 realised trading PnL across 2 closed position cycles, using 192 public fills from Mar 17, 2025 to Aug 16, 2025.

limited sampleLimited sample: only 2 closed position cycles are visible in the data covered (Mar 17, 2025 to Aug 16, 2025). Raw metrics are shown, but behavioural conclusions stay caveated until there are at least 10 closed cycles. Classification basis: closed net pnl after fees available window.Mar 17-Aug 16 dataThis audit used 192 public fills covering Mar 17, 2025 to Aug 16, 2025. The date range comes from the actual public fill and position-cycle timestamps, not a preset calendar period.
ModeProfessional keeps the tone factual. Roast uses the same numbers but writes the commentary more sharply.
ProfessionalRoast
Read trader analysisShare on X
Current account valueAccount value from Hyperliquid's public account state when this audit ran. This is a balance snapshot, not proof of lifetime deposits or withdrawals.$489,979Mar 17-Aug 16
Realised trading PnLClosed trading profit or loss after fees in the data covered: Mar 17, 2025 to Aug 16, 2025. Deposits and withdrawals are not counted as PnL. This is the visible public fill history used by this audit.-$71-0.0%
Max drawdownLargest fall from a previous balance high to a later low inside the data covered: Mar 17, 2025 to Aug 16, 2025.-19.7%2 closed position cycles
Win rateShare of closed position cycles that ended positive. Profit factor compares total winning realised PnL with total losing realised PnL.0.0%0 profit factor
Total volumeGross notional traded across 192 reconstructed public fills. A position cycle can contain many individual fills.$300,2343 position cycles
Trading PnL vs transfersRealised trading PnL comes from Hyperliquid closed-fill profit and loss. Deposits and withdrawals can change account value, but they are not counted as trading PnL here.

The dollar PnL is the realised result from closed trades in the data covered. The percentage uses an inferred starting value (current account value $489,979 minus closed trading PnL -$71 = starting estimate $490,050). This audit does not ingest a deposit or withdrawal ledger, so it can show that trades lost money, but it cannot prove whether the owner also moved funds in or out.

Data coveredThis audit used 192 public fills covering Mar 17, 2025 to Aug 16, 2025. The date range comes from the actual public fill and position-cycle timestamps, not a preset calendar period.Mar 17, 2025 to Aug 16, 2025

This is not a fixed last-week or last-month period. It is the actual span covered by the public fills used for this wallet, so the page should be read as 151 calendar days of visible trading history.

Public fills
192
Position cycles
2 closed, 1 open
Limit
public fill cap not hit
Equity curveA historical line showing how the wallet balance moved across the data covered: Mar 17, 2025 to Aug 16, 2025. It is not a prediction.$489,979
all visible fillsThis audit used 192 public fills covering Mar 17, 2025 to Aug 16, 2025. The date range comes from the actual public fill and position-cycle timestamps, not a preset calendar period.
Equity curve by date and account valueX-axis shows date. Y-axis shows account value in US dollars. The line starts at Mar 17 with $490k and ends at Aug 16 with $490k.Account value (USD)Date$490k$490k$490kMar 17Aug 16
Audit summaryA short extract from the full trader analysis below. It is built from the stored numbers and evidence pack.What matters immediately
  • Data used: 192 public fills from Mar 17, 2025 to Aug 16, 2025; this is the actual visible trading span, not a preset last-week or last-month period.
  • The sample is too small to draw reliable conclusions about this account's trading approach.
  • Two closed episodes across 151 days of activity produced a net loss of $71.29 after fees, with zero wins recorded.
Analysis readoutA plain-language interpretation layer from the trader analysis. Use the cards and tables below for the raw evidence.Strengths & weaknesses
  • Two closed trades provide limited sample to assess consistency, edge, or execution quality.
  • Both closed episodes resulted in losses; no profitable closed trade exists in the data covered.
  • The sample is too small to support conclusions about risk management, position sizing, or trading discipline.
Trader analysisThis is the full written analysis for this wallet and mode. The metrics, flags, simulator, and tables below are the supporting evidence.Full trader analysis

Bottom line up front

The sample is too small to draw reliable conclusions about this account's trading approach. Two closed episodes across 151 days of activity produced a net loss of $71.29 after fees, with zero wins recorded. The BTC long on 17 March 2025 at $83,711 closed immediately at $83,710 for a $71 loss, flagged for averaging down. A second position in @195 opened 15 August and closed 16 August for a $0.05 loss. One open position remains. The sample is too small to support any behavioural or skill-based assessment.

What the data shows

Activity spans 151 calendar days but contains only two closed trades. The first, a BTC long entered at $83,711.03 on 17 March, held for 7.8 minutes and exited at $83,710.01, realising a $71.25 loss on a $100,100 notional position. The trade carried a 3% structural stop and was flagged for averaging down, suggesting additional fills into the position before exit. The second closed trade, @195 long opened 15 August at an unspecified entry price and closed 16 August at $0.00, realising a $0.05 loss on a $13.26 notional position over 21 hours.

Gross fees paid total $70.08 on $300,234 in gross volume, yielding a net fee drag of $69.09. Realised PnL before fees was negative $1.22, meaning fees consumed nearly 57 times the realised loss. The account holds a current balance of $489,978.69 and maintains one open position.

Trade quality

Win rate is 0% across two closed episodes. No winning trades are recorded. Gross realised loss is $71.25 on the BTC trade and $0.05 on @195. The account has not yet demonstrated a profitable closed trade in the data covered.

Post-mortems

BTC long, 17 March 2025. Entry at $83,711.03, exit at $83,710.01 after 7.8 minutes on a $100,100 notional position. Loss of $71.25. The trade was flagged for averaging down, indicating multiple fills into the position before closure. A 3% structural stop was in place.

@195 long, 15–16 August 2025. Entry price not recorded; exit at $0.00 after 21 hours on a $13.26 notional position. Loss of $0.05. No structural stop or averaging flags attached.

Honest summary

  • Two closed trades provide limited sample to assess consistency, edge, or execution quality.
  • Both closed episodes resulted in losses; no profitable closed trade exists in the data covered.
  • The sample is too small to support conclusions about risk management, position sizing, or trading discipline.

Behaviour checksRule-based warnings found in the trading history. They are not moral judgements; they mark patterns worth reviewing.

Rule-based position-cycle checks
FOMO re-entryReopened the same market and direction soon after a winning close, but at a worse entry.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

Averaging downAdded size while the position was already moving against the entry.
1
Examples
  • BTC on Mar 17, 2025: added to the position; while it was already moving against entry; outcome -$71.
Oversized loserA losing position cycle more than 3x the wallet's median closed loss.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

Revenge tradeOpened a larger-than-normal position within one hour after a closed loss.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

ExpectancyAverage result per closed position cycle after wins and losses are blended. Positive means each completed cycle added money on average.-$35.65
Fees / realised PnLFees as a share of realised trading PnL. High values mean execution cost is eating a meaningful part of the edge.n/a
Maker fill rateShare of fills that added liquidity rather than crossed the spread. Higher maker share usually means more patient execution.+90.6%

Expectancy is not a forecast. It is the historical average result per closed position cycle in this reconstructed sample.

Risk simulatorA counterfactual replay of the same historical trades using fixed risk limits. It is for comparing risk shape, not predicting future returns.

Replays the same closed position cycles with 1%, 2%, and 4% account-risk sizing. It shows what the wallet would have made or lost if each eligible cycle was sized from account value at entry and a structural stop.

1% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 1% of account value at the simulated stop.-$2
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
0.0%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
0
2% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 2% of account value at the simulated stop.-$4
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
0.0%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
0
4% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 4% of account value at the simulated stop.-$8
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
0.0%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
0

The 1%, 2%, and 4% rules are account-risk limits per position cycle, not leverage settings. If the simulated stop is breached, the cycle is stopped early. Outputs are gross of fees and funding, so use them as risk-shape comparisons rather than exact alternate realised trading PnL.

No simulator curve yetThis wallet has 1 simulated close with usable stop and candle data. The cards above are scenario totals; a time-series curve needs at least two simulated closes.

Top lossesThe largest realised losing position cycles in the data covered by this audit.

Click a row for the trade breakdown
MarketThe traded Hyperliquid market or coin.SideLong means the wallet benefited if price rose. Short means it benefited if price fell.SizeLargest notional exposure reached during the reconstructed position cycle.PnLRealised profit or loss when the position cycle closed.DateClosed date when available; otherwise the cycle open date.

Top winsThe largest realised winning position cycles in the data covered by this audit.

Realised position-cycle outcomes
MarketThe traded Hyperliquid market or coin.SideLong means the wallet benefited if price rose. Short means it benefited if price fell.SizeLargest notional exposure reached during the reconstructed position cycle.PnLRealised profit or loss when the position cycle closed.DateClosed date when available; otherwise the cycle open date.

By marketBreaks the audit down by traded market or coin so you can see which markets helped or hurt the account.

Realised results by coin
CoinThe traded Hyperliquid market.CyclesClosed reconstructed position cycles for this market. One cycle can contain many fills.WinShare of that market's closed position cycles that ended positive.PnLRealised PnL attributed to this market's closed position cycles in the data covered by this audit.
BTC10.0%-$71
@19510.0%-$0
Share this audit on X