RRektrospect

0xeadc152ac1014ace57c6b353f89adf5faffe9d55

0xeadc...9d55 wallet audit

0xeadc...9d55 audit. $1,068,564 realised trading PnL across 7 closed position cycles, using the latest 10,000 public fills from Apr 19, 2026 to May 18, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit.

limited sampleLimited sample: only 7 closed position cycles are visible in the data covered (Apr 19, 2026 to May 18, 2026). Raw metrics are shown, but behavioural conclusions stay caveated until there are at least 10 closed cycles. Classification basis: closed net pnl after fees available window.latest 10,000 fillsHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering Apr 19, 2026 to May 18, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.
ModeProfessional keeps the tone factual. Roast uses the same numbers but writes the commentary more sharply.
ProfessionalRoast
Read trader analysisShare on X
Current account valueAccount value from Hyperliquid's public account state when this audit ran. This is a balance snapshot, not proof of lifetime deposits or withdrawals.$22,851,732latest 10,000 fills
Realised trading PnLClosed trading profit or loss after fees in the data covered: Apr 19, 2026 to May 18, 2026. Deposits and withdrawals are not counted as PnL. Older public fills may exist outside this audit.$1,068,564+4.9%
Max drawdownLargest fall from a previous balance high to a later low inside the data covered: Apr 19, 2026 to May 18, 2026.-20.3%7 closed position cycles
Win rateShare of closed position cycles that ended positive. Profit factor compares total winning realised PnL with total losing realised PnL.+100.0%inf profit factor
Total volumeGross notional traded across 10,000 reconstructed public fills. A position cycle can contain many individual fills.$91,011,85621 position cycles
Trading PnL vs transfersRealised trading PnL comes from Hyperliquid closed-fill profit and loss. Deposits and withdrawals can change account value, but they are not counted as trading PnL here.

The dollar PnL is the realised result from closed trades in the data covered. The percentage uses an inferred starting value (current account value $22,851,732 minus closed trading PnL $1,068,564 = starting estimate $21,783,168). This audit does not ingest a deposit or withdrawal ledger, so it can show that trades lost money, but it cannot prove whether the owner also moved funds in or out. Older fills may also exist outside the latest 10,000-fill window.

Data coveredHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering Apr 19, 2026 to May 18, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.Apr 19, 2026 to May 18, 2026

This is not a fixed last-week or last-month period. It is the actual span covered by the latest 10,000 public fills Hyperliquid exposed for this wallet. Because the public fill source hit its cap, older trades may exist but are not included here.

Public fills
10,000
Position cycles
7 closed, 14 open
Limit
latest 10,000 fills only
Equity curveA historical line showing how the wallet balance moved across the data covered: Apr 19, 2026 to May 18, 2026. It is not a prediction.$22,851,732
latest fills onlyHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering Apr 19, 2026 to May 18, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.
Equity curve by date and account valueX-axis shows date. Y-axis shows account value in US dollars. The line starts at Apr 20 with $22M and ends at May 18 with $23M.Account value (USD)Date$23M$22M$22MApr 20May 3May 18
Audit summaryA short extract from the full trader analysis below. It is built from the stored numbers and evidence pack.What matters immediately
  • Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from Apr 19, 2026 to May 18, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
  • The account is profitable in that window: +4.91% realised PnL ($1.07M) across 7 closed episodes in 28 days, with a perfect 100% win rate.
  • The sample is too small to support claims about edge or consistency, but the closed trades show disciplined execution on directional bets in ETH, HYPE, ICP, and MON, offset by 14 open positions carrying $626k in unrealised gains that remain unresolved.
Analysis readoutA plain-language interpretation layer from the trader analysis. Use the cards and tables below for the raw evidence.Strengths & weaknesses
  • All 7 closed trades were profitable, with ETH and HYPE generating the largest gains in the data covered.
  • No stops are in place on any of the 14 open positions, despite 20x leverage on BTC and ETH, which creates unmanaged liquidation risk.
  • The sample is too small to assess consistency, edge, or behavioural patterns; 7 closed episodes over 28 days is insufficient for statistical inference.
Trader analysisThis is the full written analysis for this wallet and mode. The metrics, flags, simulator, and tables below are the supporting evidence.Full trader analysis

Bottom line up front

Only the most recent public fills are visible, so this audit covers the data covered rather than full account history. The account is profitable in that window: +4.91% realised PnL ($1.07M) across 7 closed episodes in 28 days, with a perfect 100% win rate. The sample is too small to support claims about edge or consistency, but the closed trades show disciplined execution on directional bets in ETH, HYPE, ICP, and MON, offset by 14 open positions carrying $626k in unrealised gains that remain unresolved.

What the data shows

The data covered spans 28 days from 19 April to 18 May 2026. Closed trades total $1.29M in realised PnL before fees, with $5.3k in explicit execution costs, leaving $1.07M net. All 7 closed episodes were profitable; no losses are recorded.

ETH dominates the closed record: a long position opened 20 April, held 670 hours, and closed 18 May at $2,246.24 generated $506.7k. The position reached $8.3M notional at highest balance in this window. HYPE contributed $142.9k on a 147-hour long from 19–25 April, entered at $40.51 and exited $41.46, with an ATR-based structural stop 1.74% below entry. ICP and MON each contributed $126k and $133k respectively, though MON's entry and exit prices are not visible in the available data.

The account carries 14 open positions. The largest is a BTC short at 78,124.7 with 20x leverage, holding $465k unrealised gain. A SOL short at 94.2473 with 10x leverage carries $153k unrealised. An ETH long at 2,077 with 20x leverage holds $7.9k unrealised. None of these positions have stops in place, which is material given the leverage and notional exposure.

Gross volume is $91M across 21 total episodes (7 closed, 14 open). Fee drag of $5.3k represents 0.41% of gross realised PnL—negligible relative to the win size, but worth noting given the high leverage and frequent re-entry patterns visible in the HYPE trade (flagged as averaging down).

Trade quality

Win rate is 100% across 7 closed episodes. Profit factor is infinite—no losses recorded. Expectancy cannot be computed from a zero-loss sample, but the average closed trade size is $184k. The median hold time is 147 hours (HYPE), with ETH's 670-hour hold as the outlier.

A perfect win rate over 7 trades is not evidence of edge; it is a small sample. The sample is too small to distinguish between skill, luck, and regime fit.

Open positions

BTC short dominates: $465k unrealised gain on a 20x leveraged short at 78,124.7, with no stop in place. This position is still open; the outcome is unknown until closure. SOL short is the second-largest open exposure at $153k unrealised on 10x leverage. ETH long holds $7.9k unrealised on 20x leverage. Across all three, no protective stops are active, which concentrates downside risk if reversals occur.

Honest summary

  • All 7 closed trades were profitable, with ETH and HYPE generating the largest gains in the data covered.
  • No stops are in place on any of the 14 open positions, despite 20x leverage on BTC and ETH, which creates unmanaged liquidation risk.
  • The sample is too small to assess consistency, edge, or behavioural patterns; 7 closed episodes over 28 days is insufficient for statistical inference.

Behaviour checksRule-based warnings found in the trading history. They are not moral judgements; they mark patterns worth reviewing.

Rule-based position-cycle checks
FOMO re-entryReopened the same market and direction soon after a winning close, but at a worse entry.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

Averaging downAdded size while the position was already moving against the entry.
1
Examples
  • HYPE on Apr 19, 2026: added to the position; while it was already moving against entry; outcome $142,877.
Oversized loserA losing position cycle more than 3x the wallet's median closed loss.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

Revenge tradeOpened a larger-than-normal position within one hour after a closed loss.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

ExpectancyAverage result per closed position cycle after wins and losses are blended. Positive means each completed cycle added money on average.$152,652.02
Fees / realised PnLFees as a share of realised trading PnL. High values mean execution cost is eating a meaningful part of the edge.+0.4%
Maker fill rateShare of fills that added liquidity rather than crossed the spread. Higher maker share usually means more patient execution.+99.0%

Expectancy is not a forecast. It is the historical average result per closed position cycle in this reconstructed sample.

Risk simulatorA counterfactual replay of the same historical trades using fixed risk limits. It is for comparing risk shape, not predicting future returns.

Replays the same closed position cycles with 1%, 2%, and 4% account-risk sizing. It shows what the wallet would have made or lost if each eligible cycle was sized from account value at entry and a structural stop.

1% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 1% of account value at the simulated stop.-$256,292
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
-1.1%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
1
2% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 2% of account value at the simulated stop.-$512,585
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
-2.3%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
1
4% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 4% of account value at the simulated stop.-$1,025,170
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
-4.5%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
1

The 1%, 2%, and 4% rules are account-risk limits per position cycle, not leverage settings. If the simulated stop is breached, the cycle is stopped early. Outputs are gross of fees and funding, so use them as risk-shape comparisons rather than exact alternate realised trading PnL.

No simulator curve yetThis wallet has 1 simulated close with usable stop and candle data. The cards above are scenario totals; a time-series curve needs at least two simulated closes.

Top lossesThe largest realised losing position cycles in the data covered by this audit.

Click a row for the trade breakdown
MarketThe traded Hyperliquid market or coin.SideLong means the wallet benefited if price rose. Short means it benefited if price fell.SizeLargest notional exposure reached during the reconstructed position cycle.PnLRealised profit or loss when the position cycle closed.DateClosed date when available; otherwise the cycle open date.

Top winsThe largest realised winning position cycles in the data covered by this audit.

Realised position-cycle outcomes
MarketThe traded Hyperliquid market or coin.SideLong means the wallet benefited if price rose. Short means it benefited if price fell.SizeLargest notional exposure reached during the reconstructed position cycle.PnLRealised profit or loss when the position cycle closed.DateClosed date when available; otherwise the cycle open date.
ETHlong$8,297,100$506,6882026-05-18
HYPElong$6,219,422$142,8772026-04-25
MONshort$580,705$133,0242026-04-28
ICPlong$435,108$126,2782026-05-11
ETHlong$6,993,083$96,2102026-04-20

By marketBreaks the audit down by traded market or coin so you can see which markets helped or hurt the account.

Realised results by coin
CoinThe traded Hyperliquid market.CyclesClosed reconstructed position cycles for this market. One cycle can contain many fills.WinShare of that market's closed position cycles that ended positive.PnLRealised PnL attributed to this market's closed position cycles in the data covered by this audit.
ETH2+100.0%$602,897
HYPE1+100.0%$142,877
MON1+100.0%$133,024
ICP1+100.0%$126,278
ATOM1+100.0%$51,142
ZEC1+100.0%$12,345
Share this audit on X