RRektrospect

0xec0b9ebf2a304c99cafe85c548c14dd7783cb078

0xec0b...b078 wallet audit

Open BTC long dominates this wallet: $19,451,938 notional, $167,829 +34.8% unrealised, 40x cross, liquidation $40,703. Closed trades are supporting context: -$62,847 realised trading PnL across 23 closed position cycles, using the latest 10,000 public fills from Jun 10, 2025 to Mar 13, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit.

loss-dominatedA quick bucket assigned from realised trading PnL, closed position-cycle count, and whether the public fill source was capped. Data covered: Jun 10, 2025 to Mar 13, 2026. Classification basis: closed net pnl after fees available window.position-dominatedOpen unrealised PnL is more than 2x the absolute closed realised PnL ($62,847). The page leads with open exposure, and closed trades are supporting context.latest 10,000 fillsHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering Jun 10, 2025 to Mar 13, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.
ModeProfessional keeps the tone factual. Roast uses the same numbers but writes the commentary more sharply.
ProfessionalRoast
Dominant open positionThis wallet is led by live open exposure rather than closed trades. The trigger is open unrealised PnL greater than 2x closed realised PnL, or the largest open notional greater than closed-trade volume.Open BTC long dominates this wallet: $19,451,938 notional, $167,829 +34.8% unrealised, 40x cross, liquidation $40,703.

Closed trades still matter, but they are not the main account story here. The closed-trade sample covers Jun 10, 2025 to Mar 13, 2026; the open-position figures are live account-state figures from Hyperliquid when the audit ran. The unrealised PnL is still open, not a locked result; liquidation at $40,703 remains the downside boundary for this position.

Position
BTC long
Open PnL
$167,829 (+34.8% ROE)
Notional
$19,451,938
Liquidation
$40,703
Read this as
entry $73,828 · mark $74,471 · 40x cross · $486,298 margin used
LiquidationLiquidation price reported by Hyperliquid for the dominant open position when available.$40,70340x cross
Closed realised PnLClosed trading profit or loss after fees in the data covered: Jun 10, 2025 to Mar 13, 2026. This excludes the live unrealised PnL above.-$62,84723 closed cycles
Closed volumeGross notional from closed position cycles in the data covered. This is the comparison used to decide whether an open position dominates the wallet.$107,659,79040 total cycles
Trading PnL vs transfersRealised trading PnL comes from Hyperliquid closed-fill profit and loss. Deposits and withdrawals can change account value, but they are not counted as trading PnL here.

This audit is position-dominated, so open unrealised PnL is shown separately from closed realised trading PnL. The dollar PnL is the realised result from closed trades in the data covered. The percentage uses an inferred starting value (current account value $9,694,836 minus closed trading PnL -$62,847 = starting estimate $9,757,683). This audit does not ingest a deposit or withdrawal ledger, so it can show that trades lost money, but it cannot prove whether the owner also moved funds in or out. Older fills may also exist outside the latest 10,000-fill window.

Data coveredHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering Jun 10, 2025 to Mar 13, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.Jun 10, 2025 to Mar 13, 2026

This is not a fixed last-week or last-month period. It is the actual span covered by the latest 10,000 public fills Hyperliquid exposed for this wallet. Because the public fill source hit its cap, older trades may exist but are not included here.

Public fills
10,000
Position cycles
23 closed, 17 open
Limit
latest 10,000 fills only
Equity curveA historical line showing how the wallet balance moved across the data covered: Jun 10, 2025 to Mar 13, 2026. It is not a prediction.$9,694,836
latest fills onlyHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering Jun 10, 2025 to Mar 13, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.
Equity curve by date and account valueX-axis shows date. Y-axis shows account value in US dollars. The line starts at Jun 10 with $9.8M and ends at Mar 13 with $9.7M.Account value (USD)Date$9.8M$9.3M$8.8MJun 10Jul 17Mar 13
Audit summaryA short extract from the full trader analysis below. It is built from the stored numbers and evidence pack.What matters immediately
  • Open BTC long dominates this wallet: $19,451,938 notional, $167,829 +34.8% unrealised, 40x cross, liquidation $40,703.
  • Closed-trade context: -$62,847 realised trading PnL across 23 closed position cycles in the data covered.
  • Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from Jun 10, 2025 to Mar 13, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
Analysis readoutA plain-language interpretation layer from the trader analysis. Use the cards and tables below for the raw evidence.Strengths & weaknesses
  • Open BTC long dominates this wallet: $19,451,938 notional, $167,829 +34.8% unrealised, 40x cross, liquidation $40,703.
  • Closed-trade context: -$62,847 realised trading PnL across 23 closed position cycles in the data covered.
  • Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from Jun 10, 2025 to Mar 13, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
Trader analysisThis is the full written analysis for this wallet and mode. The metrics, flags, simulator, and tables below are the supporting evidence.Full trader analysis

Bottom line up front

Open BTC long dominates this wallet: $19.45M notional, $167,829 unrealised gain, 34.81% unrealised ROE, 40x leverage, cross margin. This position remains open and the unrealised PnL is not locked in; the liquidation boundary sits at $40,703, representing material downside risk. The closed-trade record across the data covered is loss-making: -$62,847 realised PnL after $68,614 in fees, with a deepest decline in this window of -85.1% from the highest balance of $26.6M to the lowest of $3.97M. The account is dominated by open leverage exposure that dwarfs the realised loss; the final outcome depends entirely on whether the BTC position and the four other open longs (ETH, DOGE, CRV, NEAR) survive their current underwater positions or are forced to realise further losses.

What the data shows

This wallet has been active for 275 days across the data covered, executing 40 total episodes (23 closed, 17 open). The account started with approximately $9.76M and currently holds $9.69M in cash, but carries $36.48M in open notional exposure across five long positions. The closed-trade record is instructive: 39.13% win rate, 0.95 profit factor, and -$2,732 expectancy per trade. Fees consumed $68,614 of gross volume, and the net realised loss of -$62,847 sits just above breakeven only because the account clawed back $281,627 from long positions against $344,474 in short-side losses.

The BTC position is the outlier. Across seven closed BTC episodes, the account realised $530,323 in net profit—the only instrument with a coherent edge. However, the short side of BTC has been toxic: two short episodes (including a -$192,143 loss on 9-10 July 2025 when BTC rallied from $111,006 to $113,435 in 23 hours) wiped out gains and triggered revenge trading. The account opened a $10M BTC long on 10 July 2025 immediately after the short loss, then re-entered again on 11 July and 17 July with similar sizing. The 17 July entry eventually closed on 17 October 2025 for $831,063 profit, but the pattern is unmistakable: losses on one side of BTC prompt oversized re-entries on the other.

Outside BTC, the account has no edge. MKR, HYPE, RESOLV, SOL, VIRTUAL, and CRV all produced losses. The MKR trade alone—opened 13 June 2025 at $1,920.68, exited 5 September 2025 at $1,705.13—cost $547,103, a position that reached $2.27M notional and never recovered from a -19.12% maximum adverse excursion. HYPE lost $194,530 across two episodes. The wins in AAVE ($103,613), UNI ($70,198), and LTC ($64,865) were small and infrequent, insufficient to offset the structural losses.

The open book is a mirror of this dysfunction. ETH is underwater by $305,951 (-50.19% ROE) after 348 days held since 13 June 2025, with $1.23M in cumulative funding costs. DOGE is catastrophically underwater: -$560,547 (-399.93% ROE) on a 10x leveraged position entered 5 February 2026. CRV is down $250,736 (-595.21% ROE) after 350 days. Only NEAR shows a small gain (+$13,897). The BTC long is the only position with material unrealised profit, and it carries the highest leverage (40x) and the tightest liquidation boundary.

Trade quality

Win rate of 39.13% with a profit factor of 0.95 means the account is losing money on a per-trade basis. The win/loss ratio of 1.48 indicates that winning trades average $141,597 while losing trades average -$95,515, but the win rate is too low to overcome this asymmetry. Expectancy of -$2,732 per trade is the bottom line: every closed trade, on average, destroys capital after fees. The max loss streak of 7 consecutive losses and the max win streak of only 4 demonstrate that the account has no consistent signal and is vulnerable to extended drawdowns. Fees of $68,614 on $107.66M in closed gross volume represent 0.064% of closed volume—reasonable execution costs, but they arrived on top of a fundamentally unprofitable trading strategy.

Post-mortems

MKR long, 13 June – 5 September 2025. Entry price $1,920.68, exit $1,705.13, loss -$547,103. Position reached $2.27M notional. The trade was underwater from entry (maximum adverse excursion -19.12%) and never recovered (maximum favourable excursion only -3.68%). This was the single largest loss in the closed record and sits 10.12x the median loss size. The structural stop distance was 4.05% based on ATR(14,1h), but the position was allowed to run to a -28.5% loss before exit. No evidence of risk management.

HYPE long, 18 July – 27 August 2025. Entry price unavailable, exit $47.20, loss -$194,530. Position reached $2.20M notional. This was the second-largest loss, 3.6x the median loss size. The trade was held for 945 hours and closed with no entry price recorded, suggesting a complex or rolled position. The loss is structural, not a timing miss.

BTC short, 9–10 July 2025. Entry $111,005.66, exit $113,434.98, loss -$192,143. Position reached $9.58M notional. This 23-hour short was immediately followed by a revenge trade: a $10M BTC long opened on 10 July 2025 at 20:36 UTC. The short loss triggered the first of five consecutive BTC re-entries over the next week, each at ~$10M notional and 40x leverage. This is the clearest evidence of loss-driven position-sizing escalation in the record.

What the risk simulation reveals

The risk simulator applies historical stop-loss rules to the closed-trade record. Under a 1% stop rule, the account would have realised -$431,889 with a maximum decline of -4.19%, stopping out 2 trades early. Under 2%, the loss expands to -$863,779 with a -8.39% decline. Under 4%, the loss reaches -$1.73M with a -16.78% decline. These are gross-of-fees figures. The simulation shows that mechanical stops would have prevented the catastrophic MKR and HYPE losses but would have locked in losses on other positions that eventually recovered. The account's actual maximum decline of -85.1% far exceeds what any reasonable stop rule would have produced, indicating that the account was not using stops and allowed positions to decay far beyond any rational risk boundary.

Open positions

BTC long, 261.2 contracts, $19.45M notional, 40x leverage, cross margin. Entry $73,828.40, mark $74,471, unrealised gain $167,829 (34.81% ROE). Liquidation price $40,703.32. No stop in place. This position is the account

Behaviour checksRule-based warnings found in the trading history. They are not moral judgements; they mark patterns worth reviewing.

Rule-based position-cycle checks
FOMO re-entryReopened the same market and direction soon after a winning close, but at a worse entry.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

Averaging downAdded size while the position was already moving against the entry.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

Oversized loserA losing position cycle more than 3x the wallet's median closed loss.
3
Examples
  • MKR: -$547,103 realised loss; 10.1x median closed loss.
  • BTC: -$192,143 realised loss; 3.6x median closed loss.
+1 more matching cycle
Revenge tradeOpened a larger-than-normal position within one hour after a closed loss.
5
Examples
  • BTC on Jun 11, 2025: followed a -$8,284 loss; larger-than-normal size.
  • SOL on Jul 2, 2025: followed a -$4,347 loss; larger-than-normal size.
+3 more matching cycles
ExpectancyAverage result per closed position cycle after wins and losses are blended. Positive means each completed cycle added money on average.-$2,732.49
Fees / realised PnLFees as a share of realised trading PnL. High values mean execution cost is eating a meaningful part of the edge.n/a
Maker fill rateShare of fills that added liquidity rather than crossed the spread. Higher maker share usually means more patient execution.0.0%

Expectancy is not a forecast. It is the historical average result per closed position cycle in this reconstructed sample.

Risk simulatorA counterfactual replay of the same historical trades using fixed risk limits. It is for comparing risk shape, not predicting future returns.

Replays the same closed position cycles with 1%, 2%, and 4% account-risk sizing. It shows what the wallet would have made or lost if each eligible cycle was sized from account value at entry and a structural stop.

1% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 1% of account value at the simulated stop.-$431,889
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
-4.2%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
2
2% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 2% of account value at the simulated stop.-$863,779
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
-8.4%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
2
4% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 4% of account value at the simulated stop.-$1,727,557
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
-16.8%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
2

The 1%, 2%, and 4% rules are account-risk limits per position cycle, not leverage settings. If the simulated stop is breached, the cycle is stopped early. Outputs are gross of fees and funding, so use them as risk-shape comparisons rather than exact alternate realised trading PnL.

Equity curve by date and account valueX-axis shows date. Y-axis shows account value in US dollars. The line starts at Jun 10 with $10M and ends at Mar 13 with $9.4M.Account value (USD)Date$10M$9.8M$9.4MJun 10Jun 22Mar 13

Top lossesThe largest realised losing position cycles in the data covered by this audit.

Click a row for the trade breakdown
MarketThe traded Hyperliquid market or coin.SideLong means the wallet benefited if price rose. Short means it benefited if price fell.SizeLargest notional exposure reached during the reconstructed position cycle.PnLRealised profit or loss when the position cycle closed.DateClosed date when available; otherwise the cycle open date.

Top winsThe largest realised winning position cycles in the data covered by this audit.

Realised position-cycle outcomes
MarketThe traded Hyperliquid market or coin.SideLong means the wallet benefited if price rose. Short means it benefited if price fell.SizeLargest notional exposure reached during the reconstructed position cycle.PnLRealised profit or loss when the position cycle closed.DateClosed date when available; otherwise the cycle open date.
BTClong$9,988,404$831,0632025-10-17
HYPElong$1,088,070$137,3572025-07-18
AAVElong$1,190,514$103,6132025-07-18
UNIlong$1,171,618$84,1022025-07-09
LTClong$1,163,542$64,8652025-07-18

By marketBreaks the audit down by traded market or coin so you can see which markets helped or hurt the account.

Realised results by coin
CoinThe traded Hyperliquid market.CyclesClosed reconstructed position cycles for this market. One cycle can contain many fills.WinShare of that market's closed position cycles that ended positive.PnLRealised PnL attributed to this market's closed position cycles in the data covered by this audit.
MKR10.0%-$547,103
BTC7+28.6%$530,323
AAVE1+100.0%$103,613
RESOLV10.0%-$94,894
SOL10.0%-$73,730
UNI2+50.0%$70,198
LTC1+100.0%$64,865
VIRTUAL10.0%-$60,746
HYPE2+50.0%-$57,174
xyz:CL2+100.0%$16,900
CRV10.0%-$11,638
TIA1+100.0%$6,950
AVAX10.0%-$6,065
XRP10.0%-$4,347
Share this audit on X