- Open BTC short dominates this wallet: $1,886,294 notional, -$6,427 -1.0% unrealised, 3x cross, liquidation $133,426.
- Closed-trade context: -$1,281 realised trading PnL across 142 closed position cycles in the data covered.
- Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from May 18, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
0xf5d81a135f756ca16544e53c20fc20643ec3ad53
0xf5d8...ad53 wallet audit
Open BTC short dominates this wallet: $1,886,294 notional, -$6,427 -1.0% unrealised, 3x cross, liquidation $133,426. Closed trades are supporting context: -$1,281 realised trading PnL across 142 closed position cycles, using the latest 10,000 public fills from May 18, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit.
Closed trades still matter, but they are not the main account story here. The closed-trade sample covers May 18, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; the open-position figures are live account-state figures from Hyperliquid when the audit ran. The unrealised PnL is still open, not a locked result; liquidation at $133,426 remains the downside boundary for this position.
- Position
- BTC short
- Open PnL
- -$6,427 (-1.0% ROE)
- Notional
- $1,886,294
- Liquidation
- $133,426
- Read this as
- entry $63,909 · mark $64,127 · 3x cross · $628,765 margin used
This audit is position-dominated, so open unrealised PnL is shown separately from closed realised trading PnL. The dollar PnL is the realised result from closed trades in the data covered. The percentage uses an inferred starting value (current account value $2,093,678 minus closed trading PnL -$1,281 = starting estimate $2,094,960). This audit does not ingest a deposit or withdrawal ledger, so it can show that trades lost money, but it cannot prove whether the owner also moved funds in or out. Older fills may also exist outside the latest 10,000-fill window.
This is not a fixed last-week or last-month period. It is the actual span covered by the latest 10,000 public fills Hyperliquid exposed for this wallet. Because the public fill source hit its cap, older trades may exist but are not included here.
- Public fills
- 10,000
- Position cycles
- 142 closed, 21 open
- Limit
- latest 10,000 fills only
- Open BTC short dominates this wallet: $1,886,294 notional, -$6,427 -1.0% unrealised, 3x cross, liquidation $133,426.
- Closed-trade context: -$1,281 realised trading PnL across 142 closed position cycles in the data covered.
- Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from May 18, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
Bottom line up front
Open BTC short dominates this wallet: $1,886,294 notional, -$6,426.79 unrealised, -1.03% unrealised ROE, 3× cross leverage, liquidation boundary at $133,425.76. This is still open exposure; the unrealised loss is not locked in, and the final outcome remains unknown until the position closes. Only the most recent public fills are visible, so this audit covers the data covered rather than full account history. Across 142 closed trades in that window, the account is -$1,281.46 (-0.06%), but the headline obscures a severe behavioural pattern: the wallet has cycled through five distinct averaging-down episodes, five revenge trades, and five FOMO re-entries, all of which have bled capital. The BTC short is a symptom of the same impulse that has defined the closed-trade record: size without conviction, and re-entry without discipline.
What the data shows
The account opened on 18 May 2026 with an estimated starting balance of $2,094,960. By 20 May, it had fallen to $872,251—a deepest decline in this window of 78.28%—before recovering to a highest balance in this window of $9,580,774 on 10 July. The current balance is $2,093,678, nearly flat to entry but with $6,454 in unrealised losses sitting in open positions.
The closed-trade record reveals no edge. Win rate is 42.25%, profit factor is 0.47, and expectancy is -$9.02 per trade. Fees paid $901.39 net, which is immaterial relative to the realised loss of -$2,021.80. The account lost money on both long and short sides: longs returned -$595.07 (36.49% win rate), shorts returned -$686.39 (48.53% win rate). No instrument shows consistent profitability. DOGE, FARTCOIN, and TAO generated small wins ($27.57, $20.44, $19.37 respectively), but these are noise against the losses in HYPE (-$741.44 across 18 episodes), BTC (-$197.69 across 6 episodes), and ZEC (-$151.15 across 14 episodes).
The account's capital destruction is behavioural, not technical. Five distinct averaging-down episodes are recorded: BTC long (9 adds, max size 0.93, -$92.50), ZEC short (5 adds, max size 27.34, -$6.50), ZEC long (1 add, +$4.69), SOL long (1 add, -$53.92), and XPL long (8 adds, max size 29,767, -$4.25). Five revenge trades follow small losses: ETH long after a $3.57 BTC loss, ZEC long after a $1.40 PAXG loss, SOL long after a $0.44 ETH loss, ZEC short after a $0.14 MEGA loss, and HYPE long after a $10.02 ZEC loss. Five FOMO re-entries are flagged, all in HYPE except one in ETH, with cumulative outcome of -$299.35.
Trade quality
Win rate of 42.25% against an average win of $18.91 and average loss of -$29.46 produces a win/loss ratio of 0.64 and a profit factor of 0.47. This means for every dollar won, the account loses $2.13. Expectancy of -$9.02 per trade is the mathematical consequence: the account is expected to lose money on each execution. Across 142 closed episodes and $9.79m in gross closed volume, this is not variance; it is structural.
Post-mortems
HYPE long, 19 May 2026, entry $47.75, exit $47.91, -$434.82 loss, 6.05 hours.
This trade carries four flags: FOMO re-entry, oversized loser, revenge trade, and averaging down. The account had closed a ZEC short at a $10.02 loss on 18 May at 18:00. Within 54 minutes, it re-entered HYPE long at $47.75 on 19 May at 11:54, building a $130,771 notional position. The trade moved against it immediately (MAE null, suggesting poor fill data or rapid liquidation), and closed 6 hours later at $47.91 for a -$434.82 realised loss. The structural stop distance was 2.37% (ATR 14 1H), meaning a disciplined exit would have capped the loss at roughly $3,100 notional. Instead, the account held through the full deepest decline in this window and exited at a worse price. This is a textbook revenge trade: small prior loss, large subsequent position, no stop discipline.
ETH short, 10 July 2026, entry $1,792.32, exit $1,795.18, -$133.86 loss, 0.35 hours.
This trade carries four flags: averaging down, FOMO re-entry, oversized loser, and revenge trade. The account opened a $70,390 notional short, held it for 21 minutes, and exited at a -$133.86 loss. The structural stop was 1.13% away. The trade shows no conviction: it was opened and closed within the same hour on 10 July, after the account had already closed a HYPE long at $59.35 and a HYPE short at $67.17 in the same session. This is rapid-fire re-entry behaviour, not position management.
What the risk simulation reveals
Under a 1% stop-loss rule applied historically, the account would have realised +$73,050.57 with a max decline of -1.86%. Under 2%, it would have realised +$146,101.15 with a max decline of -3.54%. Under 4%, it would have realised +$292,202.30 with a max decline of -6.48%. In all three scenarios, win rate would have held at 50.36%, and 13 episodes would have been stopped early. This is the clearest evidence in the data: mechanical stops would have inverted the account from -$1,281 loss to six-figure gains. The account does not lack edge in individual trades; it lacks the discipline to exit when wrong.
Open positions
The BTC short at $1,886,294 notional (29.415 contracts, 3× leverage, cross margin) is the dominant exposure. Entry was at $63,908.50; mark price is $64,127.00. Unrealised loss is -$6,426.79 (-1.03% ROE). The liquidation boundary is at $133,425.76, which is 108% above current mark price—a wide cushion, but the position is underwater and has no stop in place. Funding has cost -$16,087.26 since entry.
Four smaller positions are open: ETH short ($27,980 notional, 15.5974 size, -$8.91 unrealised, 0 days held), SOL short ($11,730 notional, 150.25 size, -$9.77 unrealised, 0 days held), BNB long ($12.09 notional, 0.021 size, $0.00 unrealised, 0 days held), and DOGE short ($1,689.92 notional, 22,805 size, -$2.19 unrealised
Behaviour checksRule-based warnings found in the trading history. They are not moral judgements; they mark patterns worth reviewing.
Rule-based position-cycle checks- HYPE on May 19, 2026: re-entered at 47.75 after closing at 45.56 (May 18, 2026 prior close); outcome -$435.
- HYPE on Jul 10, 2026: re-entered at 67.09 after closing at 59.35 (Jul 10, 2026 prior close); outcome $133.
- BTC on May 18, 2026: added to the position; while it was already moving against entry; outcome -$92.
- ZEC on May 18, 2026: added to the position; while it was already moving against entry; outcome -$6.
- TON: -$19 realised loss; 13.3x median closed loss.
- BTC: -$92 realised loss; 64.9x median closed loss.
- ETH on May 18, 2026: followed a -$4 loss; larger-than-normal size.
- ZEC on May 18, 2026: followed a -$1 loss; larger-than-normal size.
Expectancy is not a forecast. It is the historical average result per closed position cycle in this reconstructed sample.
Risk simulatorA counterfactual replay of the same historical trades using fixed risk limits. It is for comparing risk shape, not predicting future returns.
Replays the same closed position cycles with 1%, 2%, and 4% account-risk sizing. It shows what the wallet would have made or lost if each eligible cycle was sized from account value at entry and a structural stop.
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- -1.9%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 13
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- -3.5%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 13
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- -6.5%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 13
The 1%, 2%, and 4% rules are account-risk limits per position cycle, not leverage settings. If the simulated stop is breached, the cycle is stopped early. Outputs are gross of fees and funding, so use them as risk-shape comparisons rather than exact alternate realised trading PnL.