- Open LIT long dominates this wallet: $13,169,633 notional, $6,886,201 +548.0% unrealised, 5x cross, held at least 42 days.
- Closed-trade context: -$1,616,910 realised trading PnL across 220 closed position cycles in the data covered.
- Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from Sep 17, 2025 to Jul 10, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
- The hold duration is a lower bound because the position was already open at the first visible fill for that market.
0x77375a8c9d13bf79afb2a87f1b0ac1dfd5f5bf66
0x7737...bf66 wallet audit
Open LIT long dominates this wallet: $13,169,633 notional, $6,886,201 +548.0% unrealised, 5x cross, held at least 42 days. Closed trades are supporting context: -$1,616,910 realised trading PnL across 220 closed position cycles, using the latest 10,000 public fills from Sep 17, 2025 to Jul 10, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit.
Closed trades still matter, but they are not the main account story here. The closed-trade sample covers Sep 17, 2025 to Jul 10, 2026; the open-position figures are live account-state figures from Hyperliquid when the audit ran. The unrealised PnL is still open, not a locked result, so the final outcome is unknown.
- Position
- LIT long
- Open PnL
- $6,886,201 (+548.0% ROE)
- Notional
- $13,169,633
- Liquidation
- n/a
- Read this as
- entry $1.2958 · mark $2.7159 · held at least 42 days · 5x cross · $2,633,927 margin used
This audit is position-dominated, so open unrealised PnL is shown separately from closed realised trading PnL. The dollar PnL is the realised result from closed trades in the data covered. The percentage uses an inferred starting value (current account value $38,064,858 minus closed trading PnL -$1,616,910 = starting estimate $39,681,768). This audit does not ingest a deposit or withdrawal ledger, so it can show that trades lost money, but it cannot prove whether the owner also moved funds in or out. Older fills may also exist outside the latest 10,000-fill window.
This is not a fixed last-week or last-month period. It is the actual span covered by the latest 10,000 public fills Hyperliquid exposed for this wallet. Because the public fill source hit its cap, older trades may exist but are not included here.
- Public fills
- 10,000
- Position cycles
- 220 closed, 44 open
- Limit
- latest 10,000 fills only
- Short bias in SOL and ETH is your only repeatable pattern: Combined realised PnL on these two is +$757k across 33 episodes. If you'd sized to your actual edge instead of your account size, the math flips.
The opening paragraph
You're sitting on a LIT long worth $13.2m notional at 5x leverage, entered on 2026-05-29, held for 42 days. The unrealised PnL is +$6.89m and the unrealised ROE is 547.97%—but that is still open exposure. The outcome is unknown until the position closes. There is no liquidation price on this trade, which means you have room to breathe, but the entire data covered tells a story: you're down $1.62m on closed trades, and only this one open position is keeping you from looking like a cautionary tale on a compliance dashboard.
The greatest hits
- GOLD twice in one day, then again 532 hours later: Closed a $4.5m GOLD long for -$172,891 on 2026-03-19 at 4677.98, then opened another $3.66m GOLD long the same day and rode it for 22 days to -$356,973 on 2026-04-10. Both flagged as revenge trades. Total damage: -$529,864 on a single instrument with a 33% win rate.
- XPL cost you $144,481 in a zero-hour trade: Opened and closed a long on 2025-09-30 for a -$144k loss—50x the median losing episode. The evidence pack flags it as oversized.
- OP, UNI, and BRENTOIL revenge entries stacked losses: OP revenge on 2025-09-17 after a -$962 loss (notional $824k); UNI revenge on 2025-09-17 after -$13.7k (notional $798k); BRENTOIL revenge on 2026-04-07 after a prior loss (notional $858k). None of these closed green.
- Closed 220 episodes with a 15.45% win rate and 0.35 profit factor: Long trades averaged -$1.35m realised PnL; short trades averaged -$271k. The risk simulator shows that at 1% risk per trade, you'd have made $9.45m with a 40% win rate—the skill is there, but position sizing and instrument selection buried it.
- Funding costs have been brutal: AAVE shorts cost $40,278 in funding alone and are now underwater by $1.59m unrealised. WLD shorts cost $12,951 in funding but are up $724k. The margin is cross, the leverage is on, and the funding meter is still running.
The pattern
You have genuine edge in SOL and ETH shorts (primary_edge verdict, 38% and 20% win rates respectively), but you're burying it under oversized losses in instruments with zero edge: GOLD, BRENTOIL, XPL, WLD, PLTR, AXS, and OP all show 0% win rate and combined realised losses of over $1.1m. Revenge entries follow losses instead of pausing them. The LIT position is a 48% hedge against the closed-trade carnage, not a trading thesis.
The reluctant compliments
- The LIT entry was well-timed relative to available fills: Entered at $1.2958 on 2026-05-29, now at $2.7159. That's a 2.1x move in 42 days on a 5x position, and you held it without panic-closing.
- Short bias in SOL and ETH is your only repeatable pattern: Combined realised PnL on these two is +$757k across 33 episodes. If you'd sized to your actual edge instead of your account size, the math flips.
The verdict
You've got $6.89m in unrealised gains on one position and $1.62m in realised losses on 220 closed trades. The LIT long is not a trading win—it's a life raft. The moment it closes, the data covered closes with it, and you'll be staring at a -4.07% data-covered PnL with a 67-loss streak in your history and a deepest decline in this window of -59.98% between highest balance in this window and lowest balance in this window. The skill to short SOL and ETH profitably exists in this wallet. The discipline to stop adding to GOLD does not.
Behaviour checksRule-based warnings found in the trading history. They are not moral judgements; they mark patterns worth reviewing.
Rule-based position-cycle checksNo matching position cycles in the data covered.
- MEGA on Apr 29, 2026: added to the position; while it was already moving against entry; outcome -$559.
- OP: -$40,285 realised loss; 14.1x median closed loss.
- UNI: -$13,723 realised loss; 4.8x median closed loss.
- OP on Sep 17, 2025: followed a -$962 loss; larger-than-normal size.
- UNI on Sep 17, 2025: followed a -$13,723 loss; larger-than-normal size.
Expectancy is not a forecast. It is the historical average result per closed position cycle in this reconstructed sample.
Risk simulatorA counterfactual replay of the same historical trades using fixed risk limits. It is for comparing risk shape, not predicting future returns.
Replays the same closed position cycles with 1%, 2%, and 4% account-risk sizing. It shows what the wallet would have made or lost if each eligible cycle was sized from account value at entry and a structural stop.
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- -2.3%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 5
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- -4.5%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 5
- Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
- -8.8%
- Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
- 5
The 1%, 2%, and 4% rules are account-risk limits per position cycle, not leverage settings. If the simulated stop is breached, the cycle is stopped early. Outputs are gross of fees and funding, so use them as risk-shape comparisons rather than exact alternate realised trading PnL.