RRektrospect

@Wintermute - 0xecb63caa47c7c4e77f60f1ce858cf28dc2b82b00

@Wintermute wallet audit

Open ETH short dominates this wallet: $34,095,297 notional, -$607,348 -27.2% unrealised, 15x cross, held at least 52 days, liquidation $3,255. Closed trades are supporting context: -$110 realised trading PnL across 13 closed position cycles, using the latest 10,000 public fills from May 19, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit.

loss-dominatedA quick bucket assigned from realised trading PnL, closed position-cycle count, and whether the public fill source was capped. Data covered: May 19, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026. Classification basis: closed net pnl after fees available window.position-dominatedOpen unrealised PnL is more than 2x the absolute closed realised PnL ($110). The page leads with open exposure, and closed trades are supporting context.latest 10,000 fillsHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering May 19, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.
ModeProfessional keeps the tone factual. Roast uses the same numbers but writes the commentary more sharply.
ProfessionalRoast
Dominant open positionThis wallet is led by live open exposure rather than closed trades. The trigger is open unrealised PnL greater than 2x closed realised PnL, or the largest open notional greater than closed-trade volume.Open ETH short dominates this wallet: $34,095,297 notional, -$607,348 -27.2% unrealised, 15x cross, held at least 52 days, liquidation $3,255.

Closed trades still matter, but they are not the main account story here. The closed-trade sample covers May 19, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; the open-position figures are live account-state figures from Hyperliquid when the audit ran. The unrealised PnL is still open, not a locked result; liquidation at $3,255 remains the downside boundary for this position.

Position
ETH short
Open PnL
-$607,348 (-27.2% ROE)
Notional
$34,095,297
Liquidation
$3,255
Read this as
entry $1,762 · mark $1,794 · held at least 52 days · 15x cross · $2,273,020 margin used
LiquidationLiquidation price reported by Hyperliquid for the dominant open position when available.$3,25515x cross
Closed realised PnLClosed trading profit or loss after fees in the data covered: May 19, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026. This excludes the live unrealised PnL above.-$11013 closed cycles
Closed volumeGross notional from closed position cycles in the data covered. This is the comparison used to decide whether an open position dominates the wallet.$703,862143 total cycles
Trading PnL vs transfersRealised trading PnL comes from Hyperliquid closed-fill profit and loss. Deposits and withdrawals can change account value, but they are not counted as trading PnL here.

This audit is position-dominated, so open unrealised PnL is shown separately from closed realised trading PnL. The dollar PnL is the realised result from closed trades in the data covered. The percentage uses an inferred starting value (current account value $90,996,837 minus closed trading PnL -$110 = starting estimate $90,996,947). This audit does not ingest a deposit or withdrawal ledger, so it can show that trades lost money, but it cannot prove whether the owner also moved funds in or out. Older fills may also exist outside the latest 10,000-fill window.

Data coveredHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering May 19, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.May 19, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026

This is not a fixed last-week or last-month period. It is the actual span covered by the latest 10,000 public fills Hyperliquid exposed for this wallet. Because the public fill source hit its cap, older trades may exist but are not included here.

Public fills
10,000
Position cycles
13 closed, 130 open
Limit
latest 10,000 fills only
Equity curveA historical line showing how the wallet balance moved across the data covered: May 19, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026. It is not a prediction.$90,996,837
latest fills onlyHyperliquid's public fills source is capped for very active wallets. This audit used the latest 10,000 public fills it could retrieve, covering May 19, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026. Older trades may exist outside this page, so lifetime claims are avoided.
Equity curve by date and account valueX-axis shows date. Y-axis shows account value in US dollars. The line starts at May 19 with $91M and ends at May 20 with $91M.Account value (USD)Date$91M$91M$91MMay 19May 19May 20
Audit summaryA short extract from the full trader analysis below. It is built from the stored numbers and evidence pack.What matters immediately
  • Open ETH short dominates this wallet: $34,095,297 notional, -$607,348 -27.2% unrealised, 15x cross, held at least 52 days, liquidation $3,255.
  • Closed-trade context: -$110 realised trading PnL across 13 closed position cycles in the data covered.
  • Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from May 19, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
  • The hold duration is a lower bound because the position was already open at the first visible fill for that market.
Analysis readoutA plain-language interpretation layer from the trader analysis. Use the cards and tables below for the raw evidence.Strengths & weaknesses
  • Open ETH short dominates this wallet: $34,095,297 notional, -$607,348 -27.2% unrealised, 15x cross, held at least 52 days, liquidation $3,255.
  • Closed-trade context: -$110 realised trading PnL across 13 closed position cycles in the data covered.
  • Data used: latest 10,000 public fills from May 19, 2026 to Jul 10, 2026; older public fills may exist outside this audit because the source hit its cap.
  • The hold duration is a lower bound because the position was already open at the first visible fill for that market.
Trader analysisThis is the full written analysis for this wallet and mode. The metrics, flags, simulator, and tables below are the supporting evidence.Full trader analysis

Bottom line up front

Open ETH short dominates this wallet: $34.1M notional, -$607k unrealised, -27.2% unrealised ROE, 15x leverage, cross margin, held 52 days, liquidation at $3,255. This is still open exposure; the unrealised loss is not locked in, and the final outcome is unknown until the position closes. The liquidation price sits 81% above current mark, but the position remains the primary driver of account risk. Across the data covered, closed trades lost $3.9k after fees on $704k gross volume, while four large short positions across ETH, BTC, SOL, and AVAX carry combined unrealised gains of $2.9M that mask a deeply underwater account structure.

What the data shows

This account has been active for 52 days in the data covered and is position-dominated by a single underwater ETH short entered on 19 May at $1,761.84. The position has accrued $110k in funding costs since entry and now sits $607k in the red at current mark of $1,793.80. The account's highest balance in this window was $161.1M on 17 June; the lowest balance in this window was $68.7M on 20 May, marking a deepest decline in this window of 48.7%. Current balance stands at $91M.

Closed trades tell a separate and damaging story. Thirteen closed episodes generated -$3.9k realised loss after $8.4k in net fee drag. The account is short-biased in closed trades—shorts won at 60% rate versus longs at 12.5%—but the edge is fragile. Three trades on 19 May were oversized losers: SILVER long lost $162 (37.8x median loss), SP500 long lost $35.47 (8.3x median loss), and BRENTOIL long lost $28.92 (6.8x median loss). All three were entered and exited within 12 hours. The largest win was a revenge trade: INTC short on 19 May, entered at $111.04, exited at $109.49 for $134.84 gain after a prior loss in SILVER. Win rate across all closed episodes is 30.8%, profit factor is 0.56, and expectancy per trade is -$8.44.

The account carries 130 open episodes across five coins. The ETH short is the headline, but BTC short ($5.8M notional, -$15.5k unrealised, -5.3% ROE, 20x leverage, liquidation at $371.6k) and SOL short ($14.9M notional, +$226.6k unrealised, +29.9% ROE, 20x leverage, liquidation at $222.79) are material. ATOM long ($106.6k notional, -$1.1k unrealised, -5% ROE, 5x leverage) and AVAX short ($202.2k notional, +$706 unrealised, +3.5% ROE, 10x leverage) are minor. No stops are in place on any position.

Trade quality

Win rate of 30.8% on 13 closed episodes is below breakeven. Profit factor of 0.56 means every dollar won generated $1.79 in losses. Expectancy of -$8.44 per trade confirms the closed-trade sample is unprofitable. The win/loss ratio of 1.26 (average win $34.79 versus average loss -$27.65) is inverted relative to the win rate—the account wins smaller and loses larger, a classic sign of poor risk management.

Fees paid total $8.6k gross, with net fee drag of $8.4k. On $704k gross closed trade volume, that is 1.2% of volume consumed by execution. The account is 66.1% maker, suggesting passive entry discipline, but the closed-trade losses dwarf fee impact.

Post-mortems

SILVER long, 19 May, $161.99 loss. Entered at $75.98, exited at $75.88 after 12.24 hours. Position size reached $145.6k notional. This was flagged as both an oversized loser (37.8x median loss) and a revenge trade following a $35.47 loss in SP500 earlier the same day. Structural stop distance was 1.35% from entry; the trade hit -0.13% before exit. The pattern is clear: after a small loss, the account sized into SILVER at 4x the prior position notional and held through a minor adverse move before cutting.

SP500 long, 19 May, $35.47 loss. Entered at $7,375.72, exited at $7,375.50 after 12.15 hours. Position size reached $67.2k notional. Flagged as oversized loser (8.3x median loss). Structural stop was 0.41% away; the trade moved -0.003% before exit. This was the trigger for the SILVER revenge trade that followed.

INTC short, 19 May, $134.84 win. Entered at $111.04, exited at $109.49 after 12.04 hours. Position size reached $64.9k notional. Flagged as revenge trade following the $161.99 SILVER loss. This was the only profitable revenge trade in the sample. The win came 12 hours after the SILVER exit, suggesting the account re-entered with conviction after a loss and caught a move in the right direction.

What the risk simulation reveals

Historical counterfactuals under fixed stop-loss rules show severe deepest decline in this window compression but larger absolute losses. Under a 1% rule, simulated deepest decline in this window would have been -1.18% with realised loss of -$1.07M. Under 2%, simulated deepest decline in this window would have been -2.35% with realised loss of -$2.14M. Under 4%, simulated deepest decline in this window would have been -4.7% with realised loss of -$4.28M. Two episodes would have stopped early under each rule. The simulator is gross of fees. These counterfactuals illustrate that the current 48.7% deepest decline in this window was driven by open position mark-to-market swings, not closed-trade realisation; mechanical stops would have crystallised losses instead of preserving the possibility of recovery.

Open positions

ETH short is the dominant exposure: $34.1M notional, -$607k unrealised, -27.2% ROE, 15x leverage, cross margin, 52 days held, liquidation at $3,255.41. Funding costs since entry total $110.3k. No stop is in place.

BTC short is the second-largest: $5.8M notional, -$15.5k unrealised, -5.3% ROE, 20x leverage, cross margin, 52 days held, liquidation at $371.6k. No stop is in place.

SOL short is profitable in the open window: $14.9M notional, +$226.6k unrealised, +29.9% ROE, 20x leverage, cross margin, 52 days held, liquidation at $222.79. No stop is in place.

ATOM long is a minor position: $106.6k notional, -$1.1k unrealised, -5% ROE, 5x leverage, cross margin, 52 days held, no liquidation price. No stop is in place.

AVAX short is the smallest: $202.2k notional, +$706 unrealised

Behaviour checksRule-based warnings found in the trading history. They are not moral judgements; they mark patterns worth reviewing.

Rule-based position-cycle checks
FOMO re-entryReopened the same market and direction soon after a winning close, but at a worse entry.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

Averaging downAdded size while the position was already moving against the entry.
0

No matching position cycles in the data covered.

Oversized loserA losing position cycle more than 3x the wallet's median closed loss.
3
Examples
  • xyz:SP500: -$35 realised loss; 8.3x median closed loss.
  • xyz:SILVER: -$162 realised loss; 37.8x median closed loss.
+1 more matching cycle
Revenge tradeOpened a larger-than-normal position within one hour after a closed loss.
3
Examples
  • xyz:SILVER on May 19, 2026: followed a -$35 loss; larger-than-normal size.
  • xyz:INTC on May 19, 2026: followed a -$162 loss; larger-than-normal size.
+1 more matching cycle
ExpectancyAverage result per closed position cycle after wins and losses are blended. Positive means each completed cycle added money on average.-$8.44
Fees / realised PnLFees as a share of realised trading PnL. High values mean execution cost is eating a meaningful part of the edge.n/a
Maker fill rateShare of fills that added liquidity rather than crossed the spread. Higher maker share usually means more patient execution.+66.1%

Expectancy is not a forecast. It is the historical average result per closed position cycle in this reconstructed sample.

Risk simulatorA counterfactual replay of the same historical trades using fixed risk limits. It is for comparing risk shape, not predicting future returns.

Replays the same closed position cycles with 1%, 2%, and 4% account-risk sizing. It shows what the wallet would have made or lost if each eligible cycle was sized from account value at entry and a structural stop.

1% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 1% of account value at the simulated stop.-$1,069,967
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
-1.2%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
2
2% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 2% of account value at the simulated stop.-$2,139,933
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
-2.4%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
2
4% account-risk ruleThis scenario limits each eligible position cycle to about 4% of account value at the simulated stop.-$4,279,867
Max drawdownLargest high-to-low account-value drop inside this simulated replay.
-4.7%
Stopped earlyHow many historical position cycles would have exited before the real close because the simulated stop was hit.
2

The 1%, 2%, and 4% rules are account-risk limits per position cycle, not leverage settings. If the simulated stop is breached, the cycle is stopped early. Outputs are gross of fees and funding, so use them as risk-shape comparisons rather than exact alternate realised trading PnL.

Equity curve by date and account valueX-axis shows date. Y-axis shows account value in US dollars. The line starts at May 19 with $91M and ends at May 19 with $89M.Account value (USD)Date$91M$90M$89MMay 19May 19May 19

Top lossesThe largest realised losing position cycles in the data covered by this audit.

Click a row for the trade breakdown
MarketThe traded Hyperliquid market or coin.SideLong means the wallet benefited if price rose. Short means it benefited if price fell.SizeLargest notional exposure reached during the reconstructed position cycle.PnLRealised profit or loss when the position cycle closed.DateClosed date when available; otherwise the cycle open date.

Top winsThe largest realised winning position cycles in the data covered by this audit.

Realised position-cycle outcomes
MarketThe traded Hyperliquid market or coin.SideLong means the wallet benefited if price rose. Short means it benefited if price fell.SizeLargest notional exposure reached during the reconstructed position cycle.PnLRealised profit or loss when the position cycle closed.DateClosed date when available; otherwise the cycle open date.
xyz:INTCshort$64,969$1352026-05-19
xyz:BRENTOILshort$20,428$22026-05-19
xyz:MRVLshort$6,136$22026-05-19
xyz:MRVLlong$420$02026-05-19

By marketBreaks the audit down by traded market or coin so you can see which markets helped or hurt the account.

Realised results by coin
CoinThe traded Hyperliquid market.CyclesClosed reconstructed position cycles for this market. One cycle can contain many fills.WinShare of that market's closed position cycles that ended positive.PnLRealised PnL attributed to this market's closed position cycles in the data covered by this audit.
xyz:SILVER10.0%-$162
xyz:INTC2+50.0%$131
xyz:SP50020.0%-$37
xyz:BRENTOIL3+33.3%-$27
xyz:MSTR10.0%-$11
xyz:MU10.0%-$4
xyz:MRVL3+66.7%$1
Share this audit on X